1962
DOI: 10.2307/4591589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Plasma Reagin Card Test for Syphilis and Other Treponematoses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These lipids are thought to be derived from the host and incorporated into the membrane of the metabolically limited T. pallidum (105), producing a configuration that is antigenic. Decades later, the antilipoidal antibody VDRL and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests were developed (132,237). Automation, antigen stability, the ability to use plasma rather than serum, and macroscopic observation (199) make the RPR test more conducive for use in clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Antibodies In Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lipids are thought to be derived from the host and incorporated into the membrane of the metabolically limited T. pallidum (105), producing a configuration that is antigenic. Decades later, the antilipoidal antibody VDRL and rapid plasma reagin (RPR) tests were developed (132,237). Automation, antigen stability, the ability to use plasma rather than serum, and macroscopic observation (199) make the RPR test more conducive for use in clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Antibodies In Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rapid Plasm Reagin (RPR) "teardrop" card assay for fingerprick blood samples developed in 60' was the first serological test for screening of syphilis, which could be applied in field conditions without the conventional laboratory equipments 8 . DYCK et al (1993) 1 evaluated the performance of the RPR "teardrop" test with plasma obtained from finger-prick of 466 pregnant women, and the authors observed lower diagnostic features of the RPR "teardrop" test in comparison to the classical RPR performed with serum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RECENTLY reported modification of the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) card test (1) (2) The comparison of the quantitative RPR (circle) card and the VDRL slide tests on 377 serums, considering agreement to be identical titers or within plus or minus one dilution, showed a 75.9 percent agreement between the two tests. Disagreement in titer occurred in 24.1 percent of these specimens and in the majority of instances where differences in titer occurred, the quantitative RPR (circle) card test was two or more dilutions higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%