2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00560-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid onset of protection following vaccination of calves with multivalent vaccines containing modified-live or modified-live and killed BHV-1 is associated with virus-specific interferon gamma production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite their high BoHV-1 specific IFN-γ production and lymphocyte proliferation, the calves vaccinated three times with the pCDNA3.1VP8 showed no reduction of virus excretion as compared to the controls. This discrepancy between the cellular immune response and the virological protection after challenge contrasts with the results of studies performed with conventional vaccines [20,57] but is in agreement with observations of BoHV-1 DNA immunisation studies using other viral antigens [33,34,43]. The viral target antigens of DNA vaccines are very limited as compared to those encountered in conventional vaccines and the protective cellular immunity may be restricted to only a few proteins of BoHV-1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Despite their high BoHV-1 specific IFN-γ production and lymphocyte proliferation, the calves vaccinated three times with the pCDNA3.1VP8 showed no reduction of virus excretion as compared to the controls. This discrepancy between the cellular immune response and the virological protection after challenge contrasts with the results of studies performed with conventional vaccines [20,57] but is in agreement with observations of BoHV-1 DNA immunisation studies using other viral antigens [33,34,43]. The viral target antigens of DNA vaccines are very limited as compared to those encountered in conventional vaccines and the protective cellular immunity may be restricted to only a few proteins of BoHV-1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As such, it has been defined as an observed reduction in clinical signs such as decreased virus shedding, lowered temperature, and decreased nasal secretions (87). Following challenge with BoHV-1, we observed a reduction in the clinical signs of infection in calves vaccinated with the fusion construct pMASIA-BNBD3-tgD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Contrary to what was observed in the avian model, the addition of beta-defensin gave protection equivalent to, but not better than, what was observed in the group given the DNA vaccine encoding the antigen alone. This was surprising in light of the improvements seen in the avian study and because protective vaccination against BoHV-1 has also been associated with increased CMI responses, particularly those in the form of increased IFN-␥ production (87). Given that humoral immunity was not enhanced in calves vaccinated with pMASIA-BNBD3-tgD compared to those vaccinated with pMASIA-tgD and that inefficient humoral immune responses have been implicated in a lack of protection from BoHV-1 challenge (reviewed in reference 88), this does suggest that the humoral immune responses were not high enough and that the improved cellular immunity induced by BNBD3 was not sufficient to result in enhanced protection from BoHV-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have reported no difference in antibody response between KV and MLV vaccines [43], Downey-Slinker et al [19] found that the MLV-vaccinated steers in the present study had greater BVDV Type 1b titer concentrations compared with KV-vaccinated steers prior to BVDV challenge, but KV-vaccinated steers had greater titers at 14 d following the challenge. Additionally, MLV vaccines have been shown to reduce susceptibility to lymphopenia and reduce the fever response to a greater extent as compared with KV vaccines [13,14]. Collectively, results from these studies suggest that the MLV vaccine was more effective at mitigating subclinical symptoms of BRD compared with the KV vaccine.…”
Section: Vaccine Treatment Effectsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In general, modifiedlive vaccines (MLV) have been shown to elicit more robust and longer-lasting immune responses [9,10] compared with killed vaccines (KV). Furthermore, modified live vaccination programs have been reported to reduce morbidity [11] and mortality rates [12], and lymphocytopenia [13] and pyrexia [14] compared with killed or no vaccine programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%