2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00458-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
77
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
77
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with Siegmund et al, who tested sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscles [18]. In contrast to those result, we observed an adaptation effect towards increased muscle onset latencies when the participants flexed their heads.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with Siegmund et al, who tested sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscles [18]. In contrast to those result, we observed an adaptation effect towards increased muscle onset latencies when the participants flexed their heads.…”
supporting
confidence: 94%
“…The kinematics showed that a significantly decreased peak angle displacement in the neck occurred after the first perturbation. Previous studies of forward perturbations have reported both increased head angles and no change in head angles [18,19]. An increased segment angle should be possible as the EMG amplitudes was reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temporal, event and amplitude awareness are the three dimensions in such anticipation. The first refers to whether the subject knows about the exact timing in which an event will occur, the second describes whether the subject knows an event will occur, and the third refers to the subject's knowledge of the magnitude of the imminent event [21][22][23]. It has been reported that awareness of an impact influences the muscle response in a simulated whiplash event [9,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frontal and lateral simulations were run with the M50-O, M50-OS, and M50-OS+B with neck muscle activation to approximate the living volunteer response. The same curve used for active musculature in the GHBMC M50-O was used in the M50-OS and M50-OS+B with the curve beginning at 134 ms of the simulation (GHBMC 2015;Siegmund et al 2003). This includes a 74-ms response time observed in Siegmund et al…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%