2001
DOI: 10.1021/ac010895d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Microfluidic Mixing

Abstract: A preformed T-microchannel imprinted in polycarbonate was postmodified with a pulsed UV excimer laser (KrF, 248 nm) to create a series of slanted wells at the junction. The presence of the wells leads to a high degree of lateral transport within the channel and rapid mixing of two confluent streams undergoing electroosmotic flow. Several mixer designs were fabricated and investigated. All designs were relatively successful at low flow rates (0.06 cm/s, > or = 75% mixing), but had varying degrees of success at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
382
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 500 publications
(403 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
382
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Passive designs are often desirable in applications involving sensitive species (e.g., biological samples) because they do not impose strong mechanical, electrical, or thermal agitation. Examples of passive micromixing approaches that have been widely investigated include the following: (i) ''split-and-recombine'' strategies where the streams to be mixed are divided or split into multiple channels and redirected along trajectories that allow them to be subsequently reassembled as alternating lamellae yielding exponential reductions in interspecies diffusion length and time scales (4,(10)(11)(12); and (ii) ''chaotic'' strategies where transverse flows are passively generated that continuously expand interfacial area between species through stretching, folding, and breakup processes (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The microchannel structures associated with these mixing elements range from relatively simple topological features on one or more channel walls (ridges, grooves, or other protrusions that can, for example, be constructed by means of multiple soft lithography, alignment, and bonding steps) to intricate 3D flow networks requiring timescales on the order of days to fabricate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive designs are often desirable in applications involving sensitive species (e.g., biological samples) because they do not impose strong mechanical, electrical, or thermal agitation. Examples of passive micromixing approaches that have been widely investigated include the following: (i) ''split-and-recombine'' strategies where the streams to be mixed are divided or split into multiple channels and redirected along trajectories that allow them to be subsequently reassembled as alternating lamellae yielding exponential reductions in interspecies diffusion length and time scales (4,(10)(11)(12); and (ii) ''chaotic'' strategies where transverse flows are passively generated that continuously expand interfacial area between species through stretching, folding, and breakup processes (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The microchannel structures associated with these mixing elements range from relatively simple topological features on one or more channel walls (ridges, grooves, or other protrusions that can, for example, be constructed by means of multiple soft lithography, alignment, and bonding steps) to intricate 3D flow networks requiring timescales on the order of days to fabricate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the ridge apex is allowed to span the entire width of the channel, for a sizable number of ridges the apex is too close to the sidewalls of the channel to induce comparable counter rotating flows. In this extreme case, the design resembles the less efficient slanted groove micromixer one [37,38]. To optimize the design and fully map the mixing index, the spacing between the ridges is changed from 50 μm to 250 μm in 25 μm steps, while the apex range is adjusted from the full width of the channel (=200 μm) to the extreme in which all the ridge tips are aligned along the longitudinal symmetry axis of the channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary advantage of polymer substrates lies in the ability for mass production at low costs based on replication (casting, embossing, imprinting, or injection molding) techniques for the possible disposable use [7]. Several important polymers including poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) [8][9][10][11], polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) [12][13][14][15], polycarbonate [16,17], and polystyrene [18,19] are now increasingly used to fabricate microfluidic systems. In particular, PDMS is a soft polymer that is being actively developed for miniaturized bioassays due to its desirable features including easy replica molding, good optical transparency (down to 230 nm), no toxicity to proteins and cells, as well as easy irreversibly or reversibly sealing to itself and other materials [9,[20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%