The economy and efficiency of the analytical procedure for the separation and determination of precious metals, such as rhodium and iridium in geological samples and related materials, are still a challenge to the analyst. Because of their low concentration levels in natural sources, a necessary first step in any analytical procedure needs to be the preconcentration of these elements. The most common and well-documented concentration-cum-separation technique is liquid-liquid extraction. However, this technique is tedious, time consuming (extraction involves several steps and equilibrium distribution between the two phases takes longer time in certain cases) and often requires a large volume of high purity toxic solvents. Column methods using various adsorbents are effective for the preconcentration of metal ions. But their main disadvantages are the lengthy method to prepare the column materials and other stringent conditions. The sorption and desorption of metal ions are carried out at low flow rates, which make these methods time consuming.1,2 To overcome these drawbacks, Satake and co-workers 3,4 developed a method called "Solid-liquid separation after the adsorption of metal-chelates onto microcrystalline naphthalene". This method is very simple, economic and less time-consuming.Only a few photometric reagents have been used for the trace determination of rhodium and iridium in solutions. The similarities in chemical properties of rhodium and iridium make it difficult to eliminate the interference between them in zero-order (normal) spectrophotometry. Tertipis and Beamish 5 separated and determined rhodium and iridium using tin(II) bromide. Stokely and Jocobs 6 proposed a simultaneous zeroorder spectrophotometric determination using 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol. Zhenya 7 reported a simultaneous dual-wavelength spectrophotometric determination using tin(II) bromide and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole. Shkil 8 separated rhodium from iridium in acid medium using 2-mercaptobenzothiazole. Wilson and Jacobs 9 separated relatively a large amount of iridium from rhodium by extracting iridium into tributyl phosphate. All of these methods utilized time-consuming solvent extraction for separation. Moreover, they are not sufficiently sensitive and selective. Derivative spectrophotometry has the advantage of higher selectivity than zero-order spectrophotometry. This increased selectivity results because bands that are overlapped in zeroorder absorption spectra can be separated in the derivative mode. Theoretical and practical studies done by O'Haver and Green 10,11 and Fell and co-workers 12,13 showed that this technique can lead to a faster and more accurate determination of multi-component mixtures that previously would have required time-consuming separation techniques. Rhodium and iridium were preconcentrated from a fairly large volume of their aqueous solutions using 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-Br-PADAP) and tetraphenylborate onto microcrystalline naphthalene in the pH ranges 5.0 -6.5 and 3.5 -5.5, re...