2010
DOI: 10.3201/eid1605.091794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Influenza Antigen Test for Diagnosis of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009

Abstract: We compared the QuickVue Influenza test with PCR for diagnosing pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in 404 persons with influenza-like illness. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 66%, 84%, 84%, and 64%, respectively. Rapid test results should be interpreted cautiously when pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus is suspected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative detection of infection rates in low influenza viral load settings, which are influenced by the influenza strain, the immunity of the patient population, and whether samples are collected early in course of infection or before antiviral therapy is begun, could be affected by lowered RNA recovery from ST-stored specimens. However, the high nasopharyngeal influenza virus levels found during the 2009 pandemic influenza A infection from our clinical samples and in other studies 26,27 (all with median C T values <30 cycles) indicate that a slight loss in RNA recovery (median 2AE4 cycles) from ST-stored samples would not affect the overall detection rate. Indeed, compared to frozen samples, the slight signal loss found in ST-stored specimens did not affect the overall influenza detection rate from clinical samples in our study, and only slightly affected influenza detection rates in the samples that were diluted to lower viral load levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The qualitative detection of infection rates in low influenza viral load settings, which are influenced by the influenza strain, the immunity of the patient population, and whether samples are collected early in course of infection or before antiviral therapy is begun, could be affected by lowered RNA recovery from ST-stored specimens. However, the high nasopharyngeal influenza virus levels found during the 2009 pandemic influenza A infection from our clinical samples and in other studies 26,27 (all with median C T values <30 cycles) indicate that a slight loss in RNA recovery (median 2AE4 cycles) from ST-stored samples would not affect the overall detection rate. Indeed, compared to frozen samples, the slight signal loss found in ST-stored specimens did not affect the overall influenza detection rate from clinical samples in our study, and only slightly affected influenza detection rates in the samples that were diluted to lower viral load levels.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…[18] Similar to recently reported studies, we were also able to detect pandemic A/H1N1pdm09. [27,28] …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] The twin swabs used in the RT-PCR samples might also have yielded a higher positivity because of a higher viral load due to a greater volume of the specimen collected by two swabs as compared to one swab in the RIDT test. Recent reports suggest that there is an inverse relationship between Ct values and viral load and those therefore qualitative results from RT-PCR assays can be converted into quantitative viral load values in clinical samples without running standard curves in parallel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…increased the chance of detecting viruses using RAT. 12,13 Therefore, low viral titres most likely explain this decline in sensitivity observed, considering that the proportion of patients with low viral titres was high among rRT-PCR positive patients (Figure 1). The cause of this low viral titres is currently not known, but this may have been due to prolonged time from illness onset to specimen collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%