2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.18.20134577
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 with LED irradiation of visible spectrum wavelenghts

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a global health crisis. The difficulty to control the viral spread due to the absence of vaccines and prophylactics measures has raised concerns about prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, it becomes more and more crucial the reduction of environmental risk factors through viral inactivation of aerosols and fomites. Photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms by light energy emitted in the visible spectrum region (VIS), not harmful for mammalian cells and safe for hu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the trend of the obtained data always shows a favorable outcome, it is presumable that an excessively high viral concentration prevents the detection of a clear-cut antiviral effect of LEDs at the MOI of 0.1 and at increased time intervals (72 hours) (Figure 3, Figure S1). Previous to our work, in a preprint redacted by De Santis et al [12], authors used a LED-device with a combination of frequencies (400-420 nm, 430-460 nm, 500-780 nm) with a main peak at 413 nm, power of 4.67 mW/cm 2 for 40 or 60 minutes. A reduction of SARS-CoV-2 plaques of 97.3% following the irradiation of 2 × 10 3 PFU/mL virions for 40 minutes and of 99.8% after the irradiation of 2 × 10 5 PFU/mL of viral particles for 60 minutes was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the trend of the obtained data always shows a favorable outcome, it is presumable that an excessively high viral concentration prevents the detection of a clear-cut antiviral effect of LEDs at the MOI of 0.1 and at increased time intervals (72 hours) (Figure 3, Figure S1). Previous to our work, in a preprint redacted by De Santis et al [12], authors used a LED-device with a combination of frequencies (400-420 nm, 430-460 nm, 500-780 nm) with a main peak at 413 nm, power of 4.67 mW/cm 2 for 40 or 60 minutes. A reduction of SARS-CoV-2 plaques of 97.3% following the irradiation of 2 × 10 3 PFU/mL virions for 40 minutes and of 99.8% after the irradiation of 2 × 10 5 PFU/mL of viral particles for 60 minutes was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of SARS-CoV-2, a preprint redacted by de Santis et al [12] showed that visible LED light with a peak at 413 nm, was able to reduce the viral load of virions that were illuminated for 40 or 60 minutes and then transferred to a cell culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blue light (380–500 nm) is less harmful to the human body compared to UV and exhibits germicidal activities, especially within the wavelength 400–500 nm 42 . LED blue light (413 nm) irradiation inactivating SARS-CoV-2 is documented 43 . The potential antiviral mechanism is via the generation of reactive oxygen species and thus, induces damage to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids in the presence of photosensitizers 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, published reports exist [26,27] that SARS-CoV-2, in particular, is quite sensitive to visible violet light, with D90 doses (90% reduction dose) in the range of only a few J/cm 2 , which would correspond to a much higher sensitivity than that reported in bacteria. This would be highly encouraging for the containment of the coronavirus pandemic, but it must be ensured that these results do not depend on the media applied during the irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%