2000
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Abstract: During the collection of airborne bacteria in a museum in England some bacterial strains were isolated which due to their fatty acid profiles were clearly identified as members of the genus Staphylococcus. As fatty acid compositions of coagulase-negative staphylococci are very similar, differing only in quantities but not in qualities, further identification at the species level without a fatty acid database was not achieved. Investigation of the isolates using the Staph ID 32 API system resulted in an identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a collection of 35 isolates with highly similar protein patterns, including strain V2-BIII-A2 T , which were isolated in October 1999 from the wall painting exposed in the chapel Virgilkapelle, strains V2-BI-09, V2-BI-A4 and V2-BII-A8 were selected for further taxonomic characterization. Comparison of genomic fingerprints of these four strains obtained after ERIC (enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus)-PCR (Wieser & Busse, 2000) supported their affiliation to a single species and clearly distinguished them from selected reference strains (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a collection of 35 isolates with highly similar protein patterns, including strain V2-BIII-A2 T , which were isolated in October 1999 from the wall painting exposed in the chapel Virgilkapelle, strains V2-BI-09, V2-BI-A4 and V2-BII-A8 were selected for further taxonomic characterization. Comparison of genomic fingerprints of these four strains obtained after ERIC (enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus)-PCR (Wieser & Busse, 2000) supported their affiliation to a single species and clearly distinguished them from selected reference strains (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to detect genotypic differences between strains GH2-4 T and GH2-5, they were subjected to repetitivesequence-based PCRs, including ERIC-, BOX-and REP-PCR, as described previously (Wieser & Busse, 2000;Louws et al, 1994). The genomic fingerprints of strain GH2-4 T generated after ERIC-, BOX-and REP-PCR were identical to those of strain GH2-5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several genomic targets have been effectively used for the identification of Staphylococcus species, including the 16S rRNA gene (Bialkowska-Hobrzanska et al, 1990;De Buyser et al, 1992), the tRNA gene intergenic spacer (Maes et al, 1997), the internal transcribed spacer (Couto et al, 2001), the heat-shock protein 60 (HSP60) gene (Goh et al, 1996), the chaperonin 60 gene (Goh et al, 1997), the femA gene (Vannuffel et al, 1999), the sodA gene (Poyart et al, 2001), the gap gene (Yugueros et al, 2000) and the nuc gene (Brakstad et al, 1992). Recently, an enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus PCR and BOX-PCR were also used in the identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains (Wieser & Busse, 2000). .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%