2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid identification of cyclopropyl fentanyl/crotonyl fentanyl in clinical urine specimens: A case study of clinical laboratory collaboration in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to shipment, 10 μL of a 10% ( w / v ) aqueous solution of mannitol was added to the cartridges and dried prior to the addition of 10 μL of an internal standard cocktail, allowing the cartridge to dry at room temperature (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Following air shipment of the cartridges to the remote testing laboratory (Vancouver Island, BC, Canada), 10 μL anonymous urine samples (previously analyzed by HPLC/MS for NPS, procedures used published elsewhere) were deposited on the preloaded cartridges, which were then returned by air shipment for PS‐MS measurements. For clarity, the anonymous urine samples were originally submitted to LifeLabs for standard drug testing, including fentanyl and its analogs.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to shipment, 10 μL of a 10% ( w / v ) aqueous solution of mannitol was added to the cartridges and dried prior to the addition of 10 μL of an internal standard cocktail, allowing the cartridge to dry at room temperature (Indianapolis, IN, USA). Following air shipment of the cartridges to the remote testing laboratory (Vancouver Island, BC, Canada), 10 μL anonymous urine samples (previously analyzed by HPLC/MS for NPS, procedures used published elsewhere) were deposited on the preloaded cartridges, which were then returned by air shipment for PS‐MS measurements. For clarity, the anonymous urine samples were originally submitted to LifeLabs for standard drug testing, including fentanyl and its analogs.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Methamphetamine, 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine, 3,4‐methylenedioxy‐ N ‐ethylamphetamine and cocaine were the most common DOA identified in these urine samples, in addition to fentanyl and norfentanyl. Cyclopropylfentanyl, a “new” IMF, was detected in several samples, with only one sample testing positive for norcarfentanil. Based upon comparison with signals observed for neat analytical standards, acetylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, carfentanil, desmethyl U‐47700, and sufentanil were not detected in any of the urine samples analyzed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CycP‐F presents the same empirical formula (C 23 H 28 N 2 O) as another fentanyl analogue, crotonylfentanyl (Cro‐F) . Analytical differentiation of these compounds has proven difficult .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, it has been recommended that findings be reported as CycP‐F/Cro‐F . The same approach will be taken in this study as has been reported previously; while the CycP‐F notation will be utilised, identification in biological samples will represent CycP‐F/Cro‐F. The metabolism of Cro‐F has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation