2009
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.096487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid High Resolution Single Nucleotide Polymorphism–Comparative Genome Hybridization Mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans

Abstract: We have developed a significantly improved and simplified method for high-resolution mapping of phenotypic traits in Caenorhabditis elegans using a combination of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and oligo array comparative genome hybridization (array CGH). We designed a custom oligonucleotide array using a subset of confirmed SNPs between the canonical wild-type Bristol strain N2 and the Hawaiian isolate CB4856, populated with densely overlapping 50-mer probes corresponding to both N2 and CB4856 SNP seq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This renormalization is necessary to account for local bias, which varies both among and within experiments and makes the detection of SNPs more difficult since artifacts associated with a strong local bias in the log 2 ratio could easily be confused with the signature expected for a SNP. Unlike previous observations that mutations near the centers of 25-mer probes are most inhibitory to efficient hybridization (Sharp et al 2007), we observed that mutations located away from the glass slide and freely floating in the solution closer to the 59-ends of our 50-mer probes produced a larger perturbation to the hybridization process, with a maximum perturbation at 7 bases in from the 59-end (probably due to steric effects; again see Figure 1 in Flibotte et al 2009). The location of the Multiple adjacent overlapping probes targeted the point mutation, so its effect on hybridization was assayed several times.…”
contrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This renormalization is necessary to account for local bias, which varies both among and within experiments and makes the detection of SNPs more difficult since artifacts associated with a strong local bias in the log 2 ratio could easily be confused with the signature expected for a SNP. Unlike previous observations that mutations near the centers of 25-mer probes are most inhibitory to efficient hybridization (Sharp et al 2007), we observed that mutations located away from the glass slide and freely floating in the solution closer to the 59-ends of our 50-mer probes produced a larger perturbation to the hybridization process, with a maximum perturbation at 7 bases in from the 59-end (probably due to steric effects; again see Figure 1 in Flibotte et al 2009). The location of the Multiple adjacent overlapping probes targeted the point mutation, so its effect on hybridization was assayed several times.…”
contrasting
confidence: 98%
“…In a previous study (Flibotte et al 1 2009) we have shown that a window of $20 bases contains a strong log 2 ratio signal (see Figure 1 in Flibotte et al 2009), and since we require about four probes to target the mutated site, this allows a maximum probe spacing of $5 bases. The plot in Flibotte's figure also shows that it would be useful to target both strands and use the small shift in the peak position on opposite strands to help distinguish single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from artifacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The color key identifying the type of mutation is provided in the inset, and the first letter represents the reference nucleotide while the second letter represents the mutated nucleotide. available where traits can be mapped to a 5-map-unit interval, or even a smaller interval, after a single cross (Michelmore et al 1991;Jakubowski and Kornfeld 1999;Wicks et al 2001;Swan et al 2002;Davis et al 2005;Flibotte et al 2009). In combination with deep sequencing these methods will provide an unprecedented resource for new forward genetics discoveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each SNP was represented on the microarray by an average of almost 40 50-mer oligonucleotides targeting both the AF16 (cb3 assembly) and the HK104 sequences. The typical spacing between adjacent oligonucleotides was 2 bases and the targeted strand was selected to ensure the SNPs were as far as possible from the slide to maximize the SNP signal (Flibotte et al 2009). The current microarray design is available to the community under the name ''080211_Moerman_cbriggsae_CGH'' and researchers are encouraged to contact the authors to inquire about potential future releases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%