2010
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.110270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Tools for Investigating the Comparative Biology of Caenorhabditis  briggsae and C. elegans

Abstract: Comparative studies of Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans have provided insights into gene function and developmental control in both organisms. C. elegans is a well developed model organism with a variety of molecular and genetic tools to study gene functions. In contrast, there are only very limited tools available for its closest relative, C. briggsae. To take advantage of the full potential of this comparative approach, we have developed several genetic and molecular tools to facilitate functional anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then tested the mapping using the SNP-based oligonucleotide microarray we had developed previously [19]. The mapping results agreed well with those using the current method (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…We then tested the mapping using the SNP-based oligonucleotide microarray we had developed previously [19]. The mapping results agreed well with those using the current method (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Mutants were backcrossed to N2 6 times before being analyzed. The unc-119(ed3);[Cbr unc-119::mir-237]#7 and unc-119(ed3);[Cbr unc-119::mir-237]#44 strains were generated via micro-particle bombardment 73,74 of Cbr unc-119::mir-237 constructs into the C. elegans unc-119(ed3) starvation-induced lethal reporter system 75 . Primers for cloning and characterization are shown in Table S4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were consecutively collected for both GFP and mCherry channels every 90 s from 41 focal planes for a total of 6 h. For each gene perturbation, images were collected for at least three replicate embryos. Automated lineage and gene expression profiling were performed as described (22). Wild-type embryos were curated up to ϳ350-cell stage for all wild-type embryos and to the equivalent stage or to the last editable stage for all the perturbed embryos by RNAi.…”
Section: Wormmentioning
confidence: 99%