2013
DOI: 10.1167/13.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid encoding of relationships between spatially remote motion signals

Abstract: For visual processing, the temporal correlation of remote local motion signals is a strong cue to detect meaningful large-scale structures in the retinal image, because related points are likely to move together regardless of their spatial separation. While the processing of multi-element motion patterns involved in biological motion and optic flow has been studied intensively, the encoding of simpler pairwise relationships between remote motion signals remains poorly understood. We investigated this process b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure has been considered to make the visual system more sensitive to spatially modulated motion flow than to uniform flow, but it can also be regarded as a mechanism that computes spatial changes somewhat like the Laplacian operator. In addition, our recent study suggests that the visual system is very good at judging the spatiotemporal relationship between remote motion signal pairs (Maruya, Holcombe, & Nishida, 2013). This suggests the presence of a neural mechanism, more elaborate than center-surround opponency, which explicitly encodes the spatial relationships between local motion vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This structure has been considered to make the visual system more sensitive to spatially modulated motion flow than to uniform flow, but it can also be regarded as a mechanism that computes spatial changes somewhat like the Laplacian operator. In addition, our recent study suggests that the visual system is very good at judging the spatiotemporal relationship between remote motion signal pairs (Maruya, Holcombe, & Nishida, 2013). This suggests the presence of a neural mechanism, more elaborate than center-surround opponency, which explicitly encodes the spatial relationships between local motion vectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Conversely, spatial separation slightly reduced modulation elicited by synchronous motion. Synchronous motion detection is fast and surprisingly robust within a large field of view; however, detectability slightly depends upon the spatial separation between targets (Maruya et al, 2013). Hence, it is not the modulation on animacy perception per se but synchronous motion detection that would likely be responsible for the slight reduction in modulation via synchronous motion in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Separationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, at the same time, a slight dependency regarding spatial separation was also observed. This may be due to weak dependency regarding spatial distance during synchronous motion detection (Maruya, Holcombe, & Nishida, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent phase discrimination study calls this interpretation into question, however, showing significant degradation in phase discrimination performance between 10°and 100°of visual separation (Maruya, Holcombe, & Nishida, 2013), far more extensive than the maximum 16°separation tested by Aghdaee and Cavanagh (2007). Maruya and colleagues' result suggests that manipulating interelement separation is unlikely to completely 'silence' the contribution of early motion filters to temporal phase judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%