1959
DOI: 10.1021/ac60147a028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid Determination of Fluorine, Sulfur, Chlorine, and Bromine in Catalysts with Induction Furnace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two elements are present as trace impurities in lead dioxide and have negligible effect on the iodometric titration. If the exposure conditions are such that large amounts of chlorine and nitrogen are present in the candle material, modified titration procedures are available to prevent interference (Conrad, Evans, et al, 1959;Nagel, 1960). Interference due to nitro- gen and chlorine becomes evident from the intensification of blue color of starch solution in the titration vessel (left-ward swing of galvanometer needle of the titrator from its initial setting), before the normal fading due to sulfur dioxide begins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two elements are present as trace impurities in lead dioxide and have negligible effect on the iodometric titration. If the exposure conditions are such that large amounts of chlorine and nitrogen are present in the candle material, modified titration procedures are available to prevent interference (Conrad, Evans, et al, 1959;Nagel, 1960). Interference due to nitro- gen and chlorine becomes evident from the intensification of blue color of starch solution in the titration vessel (left-ward swing of galvanometer needle of the titrator from its initial setting), before the normal fading due to sulfur dioxide begins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an induction furnace was used for burning reforming catalysts, the volatility of platinum was again observed. Attempts to determine sulfur dioxide iodometrically following the Leco procedure (4) failed. Excessively high titrations led to the conclusion that some interfering element was consuming iodate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%