2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-0914-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid determination of amino acids in biological samples using a monolithic silica column

Abstract: A high-performance liquid chromatography method in which fluorescence detection is used for the simultaneous determination of 21 amino acids is proposed. Amino acids were derivatized with 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F) and then separated on a monolithic silica column (MonoClad C18-HS, 150 mm×3 mm i.d.). A mixture of 25 mM citrate buffer containing 25 mM sodium perchlorate (pH 5.5) and acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase. We found that the most significant factor in the separation was tempe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the new method to current OPA related studies (Pereira et al 2008; Kaspar et al 2009; Arrieta and Prats-Moya 2012) including analysis of complex biological matrices, it was possible to achieve a significant increase in sensitivity of chromatographic results. Overall sensitivity parameters of the method were also comparable to recent reports on sub -2 μm particle column (Mayer et al 2010) and core–shell (Song et al 2012a, b) amino acid analysis using different derivatization procedures and detection options. The obtained data show an overall improvement of detection sensitivity from μM to the nM range, which is a magnitude lower then LOD’s for OPA derivative analysis reported earlier (Wan et al 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the new method to current OPA related studies (Pereira et al 2008; Kaspar et al 2009; Arrieta and Prats-Moya 2012) including analysis of complex biological matrices, it was possible to achieve a significant increase in sensitivity of chromatographic results. Overall sensitivity parameters of the method were also comparable to recent reports on sub -2 μm particle column (Mayer et al 2010) and core–shell (Song et al 2012a, b) amino acid analysis using different derivatization procedures and detection options. The obtained data show an overall improvement of detection sensitivity from μM to the nM range, which is a magnitude lower then LOD’s for OPA derivative analysis reported earlier (Wan et al 2000).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Following on from that, we were aiming to overcome the limitation of sub -2 μm particles to special equipment caused by high column back pressure (Fekete et al 2012; Song et al 2012a, b) of about 700 bar in our case respectively. Therefore, we directly transferred chromatographic conditions to the application of a 2.6-μm core–shell C 18 column (Sunshell C18) with the same dimensions (150 mm × 2.1 mm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the retention ability of MonoTower column was similar to that of the MonoClad column, the NBD-amino acids could not be separated well. Hence, the separation conditions were optimized basically by changing the TFA concentration, which was effective on the separation of NBD-amino acids [13]. Finally, the optimized mobile phase and gradient conditions were as described in Experimental section.…”
Section: Separation Of Nbd-amino Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivatization procedure of the aliphatic amines was described previously [25][26][27]. Briefly, 20 µL of the aliphatic amine solution and 40 µL of 10 mM the NBD-F solution were mixed with 180 µL of a 0.2 M borate buffer (pH 8.5).…”
Section: Derivatization Procedures Of Aliphatic Aminesmentioning
confidence: 99%