2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-012-1338-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and Sensitive Analytical Method for Simultaneous Determination of Imidacloprid and Thiamethoxam Residues in Soils of Sugarcane Ecosystem by Reversed-Phase HPLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MEs were evaluated by calculating the slope ratios of matrix-matched and solvent calibration curves (Zhang, Li, Yu, & Pan, 2012). The LODs were estimated for a signal-to-noise ratio of 3; the LOQs were defined as the lowest spiked levels (Ramasubramanian, Paramasivam, & Jayanthi, 2012). Accuracy and precision were expressed by intra-and inter-day recoveries and RSDs, respectively (Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MEs were evaluated by calculating the slope ratios of matrix-matched and solvent calibration curves (Zhang, Li, Yu, & Pan, 2012). The LODs were estimated for a signal-to-noise ratio of 3; the LOQs were defined as the lowest spiked levels (Ramasubramanian, Paramasivam, & Jayanthi, 2012). Accuracy and precision were expressed by intra-and inter-day recoveries and RSDs, respectively (Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration curves for all three matrices were drawn by plotting the peak area vs six concentrations [0.01–0.08 mg/kg (green tobacco leaf and soil) and 0.05–4 mg/kg (cured tobacco leaf) for thiamethoxam, 0.04–5 mg/kg (green tobacco leaf and soil) and 0.2–20 mg/kg (cured tobacco leaf) for clothianidin]. The limit of detection was determined at a signal‐to‐noise ratio of 3, and the limit of quantification was defined as the lowest spiked level (Ramasubramanian, Paramasivam, & Jayanthi, ). The matrix effect (ME) was calculated as follows: ME (%) = (peak area of standard in matrix – peak area of standard in solvent)/peak area of standard in solvent × 100.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limit of detection was determined at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, and the limit of quantification was defined as the lowest spiked level (Ramasubramanian, Paramasivam, & Jayanthi, 2012). The matrix effect (ME) was calculated as follows: ME (%) = (peak area of standard in matrix peak area of standard in solvent)/peak area of standard in solvent × 100.…”
Section: Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the results were most satisfactory not only regarding extraction efficiency (Supporting Information Table S1), but also in terms of simplicity (three stages: extraction, centrifugation and concentration), rapidness (< 30 min) and solvent consumption (16 mL). Consequently, our proposed sample treatment has shown itself to be a good alternative to the existing procedures for analyzing these pesticides in soil, as they required a longer period of time [6,8,12,13,[16][17][18], more steps/instrumentation [3,[6][7][8][9][10][13][14][15][16][18][19][20][21], and a larger volume/amount of reagents [3,[6][7][8]11,12,[14][15][16][17][18]20] (Supporting Information Table S1).…”
Section: Optimization Of the Extraction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPLC with C 18 -based analytical columns is the technique of choice in the existing literature [6,7,9,10,[14][15][16][17]20,21], although GC has also been employed to determine MET [14,18] and CLO [8]. However, the use of GC was discarded since the analysis times were usually much longer than those of HPLC (Supporting Information Table S1) and because neonicotinoid insecticides such as TMX and CLO are unsuitable for direct analysis by GC due to their low volatility and high polarity [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%