2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid and on-site simultaneous electrochemical detection of copper, lead and mercury in the Amazon river

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of late, screen-printed sensors have been developed, with multiple working electrodes on the same support, for the simultaneous electrochemical detection of different analytes, like anions, cations, pesticides, phenols, amines, carbohydrates, etc. [75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Development Of Screen-printed Based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of late, screen-printed sensors have been developed, with multiple working electrodes on the same support, for the simultaneous electrochemical detection of different analytes, like anions, cations, pesticides, phenols, amines, carbohydrates, etc. [75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Development Of Screen-printed Based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 13 ] Hence, it is urgent to routinely monitor Hg 2+ ions as a challenge not only for environmental checking but also for drinking water sources and health protection. The various sophisticated and expensive techniques are available for selective determination of Hg 2+ ions included atomic absorption spectrometry, [ 14 ] atomic emission spectrometry, [ 15 ] cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, [ 16 ] X‐ray fluorescence spectrometry, [ 17 ] inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry, [ 18 ] electrochemical analysis, [ 19 ] and gas chromatography. [ 20 ] Although existing detection approaches offer high selectivity and unparalleled sensitivity, most of them have drawbacks of large sample volumes, time‐consuming, bulky instrumentation, and tedious sample preparation procedures that make in situ and on‐site analyses impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from common advanced methods for amoxicillin detection such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detector, HPLC with ultravioletvisible detector, chemiluminescence, high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and ultra performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry [13][14][15][16]; electrochemical methods have been widely applied in the analysis of antibiotics in real samples in the recent decades because of its advantages such as low cost, simple operation, fast measurement, and good sensitivity and selectivity [17]. Additionally, electrochemical methods can be easily performed for quick analysis of contaminants on-site [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%