1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(96)00081-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rapid acquisition of auditory brainstem responses with multiple frequency and intensity tone-bursts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Auditory thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing (Mitchell et al 1996). Adult mice (postnatal day 16-28 [P16-18]) were anesthetized using a ketamine (0.066 mg/g body weight)/xylazine (0.013 mg/g body weight) cocktail in 0.9% saline.…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Response Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Auditory thresholds were determined by auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing (Mitchell et al 1996). Adult mice (postnatal day 16-28 [P16-18]) were anesthetized using a ketamine (0.066 mg/g body weight)/xylazine (0.013 mg/g body weight) cocktail in 0.9% saline.…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Response Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of each tone burst was 2 ms, and responses were recorded for 12 ms. Responses were then averaged to obtain an event related potentials at each frequency and intensity (Mitchell et al 1996).…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Response Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical application of auditory brainstem response (ABR) is often limited by the practical length of a test session [Mitchell and Clemis, 1977;Jerger et al, 1985;Burkard et al, 1990a;Hamill et al, 1991;Mitchell et al, 1996]. Conventional test sessions (without sedation or anesthesia) have a limit of about 1 h. This greatly limits the number of averaged responses that can be obtained and the range of frequencies and intensities that may be examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple stimulus sequences of clicks and tone bursts have been used to increase the time efficiency when obtaining cochlear and brainstem responses [Spoor, 1974;Eggermont et al, 1976;Hoke et al, 1991;Hamill et al, 1991Hamill et al, , 1992Mitchell et al, 1996]. Only in some cases has it been documented that response adaptation was avoided [Hamill et al, 1992;Mitchell, 1991;Mitchell et al, 1996].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑2͒ AEP amplitude analysis, wherein the amplitude ͑from either time or frequency domain͒ of the AEP is used to determine if a stimulus-evoked response is present. Studies employing response-amplitude-based threshold estimations mainly involve a combination of three steps: ͑i͒ Measurement of the response amplitude, usually in terms of peak-topeak ͑e.g., May et al, 2002͒ or root mean square ͑rms͒ ͑e.g., Elberling and Don, 1984͒ voltage in the time domain or power in the frequency domain ͑e.g., Supin et al, 2001;Popper et al, 2005͒; ͑ii͒ Estimation of the background noise remaining in the average ͑see below͒; and ͑iii͒ Definition of a criterion minimum AEP amplitude for an evoked response, such as 3 dB above the background noise ͑Popper et al, 2005͒, two standard deviations ͑SDs͒ above the average background amplitude ͑May et al, 2002͒, or simply using an arbitrary value with no stated relation to the background noise ͑e.g., 0.1-0.2 V in Mitchell et al, 1996͒. A simpler AEP amplitude threshold determination approach uses the relationship between response amplitude and stimulus level to determine which stimulus levels are linearly related to AEP amplitude, regardless of background noise amplitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%