Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish

Xiao, Jianqiang; Braun, Christopher B.

doi:10.1121/1.2982366

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the overall shape of our baseline audiogram and best response frequencies were similar to prior studies using similar AEP recording procedures (Monroe et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2015). We have also adopted a criterion for threshold determination based on the visual inspection of the AEP responses, which may be more subjective than alternative methods including comparison between AEP amplitude and controlled residual noise to set specific threshold criteria (Xiao & Braun, 2008). Future research may consider alternative objective threshold determination techniques to reduce interobserver variability and facilitate comparison of auditory threshold data in future studies.…”

Section: Noise-induced Hearing Loss In Zebrafishmentioning

confidence: 68%

Noise-induced hearing loss in zebrafish: investigating structural and functional inner ear damage and recovery

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Section: Noise-induced Hearing Loss In Zebrafishmentioning

confidence: 68%

Noise-induced hearing loss in zebrafish: investigating structural and functional inner ear damage and recovery

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Xiao and Braun ( 2008 ) investigated the effects of residual noise on threshold determination in order to reduce interobserver disagreements during subjective threshold estimations. An objective method of threshold determination was developed based on comparison between AEP amplitude and controlled residual noise.…”

Section: Other Factors Affecting Auditory Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish

Ladich

Fay

2013

Rev Fish Biol Fisheries

220

164

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A recent survey lists more than 100 papers utilizing the auditory evoked potential (AEP) recording technique for studying hearing in fishes. More than 95 % of these AEP-studies were published after Kenyon et al. introduced a non-invasive electrophysiological approach in 1998 allowing rapid evaluation of hearing and repeated testing of animals. First, our review compares AEP hearing thresholds to behaviorally gained thresholds. Second, baseline hearing abilities are described and compared in 111 fish species out of 51 families. Following this, studies investigating the functional significance of various accessory hearing structures (Weberian ossicles, swim bladder, otic bladders) by eliminating these morphological structures in various ways are dealt with. Furthermore, studies on the ontogenetic development of hearing are summarized. The AEP-technique was frequently used to study the effects of high sound/noise levels on hearing in particular by measuring the temporary threshold shifts after exposure to various noise types (white noise, pure tones and anthropogenic noises). In addition, the hearing thresholds were determined in the presence of noise (white, ambient, ship noise) in several studies, a phenomenon termed masking. Various ecological (e.g., temperature, cave dwelling), genetic (e.g., albinism), methodical (e.g., ototoxic drugs, threshold criteria, speaker choice) and behavioral (e.g., dominance, reproductive status) factors potentially influencing hearing were investigated. Finally, the technique was successfully utilized to study acoustic communication by comparing hearing curves with sound spectra either under quiet conditions or in the presence of noise, by analyzing the temporal resolution ability of the auditory system and the detection of temporal, spectral and amplitude characteristics of conspecific vocalizations.

show abstract

“…72). Xiao and Braun (2008) investigated the effects of residual noise on threshold determination in order to reduce interobserver disagreements during subjective threshold estimations. An objective method of threshold determination was developed based on comparison between AEP amplitude and controlled residual noise.…”

Section: Comparison Of Different Aep-protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Ladich

2011

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A recent survey lists more than 100 papers utilizing the auditory evoked potential (AEP) recording technique for studying hearing in fishes. More than 95 % of these AEP-studies were published after Kenyon et al. introduced a non-invasive electrophysiological approach in 1998 allowing rapid evaluation of hearing and repeated testing of animals. First, our review compares AEP hearing thresholds to behaviorally gained thresholds. Second, baseline hearing abilities are described and compared in 111 fish species out of 51 families. Following this, studies investigating the functional significance of various accessory hearing structures (Weberian ossicles, swim bladder, otic bladders) by eliminating these morphological structures in various ways are dealt with. Furthermore, studies on the ontogenetic development of hearing are summarized. The AEP-technique was frequently used to study the effects of high sound/ noise levels on hearing in particular by measuring the temporary threshold shifts after exposure to various noise types (white noise, pure tones and anthropogenic noises). In addition, the hearing thresholds were determined in the presence of noise (white, ambient, ship noise) in several studies, a phenomenon termed masking. Various ecological (e.g., temperature, cave dwelling), genetic (e.g., albinism), methodical (e.g., ototoxic drugs, threshold criteria, speaker choice) and behavioral (e.g., dominance, reproductive status) factors potentially influencing hearing were investigated. Finally, the technique was successfully utilized to study acoustic communication by comparing hearing curves with sound spectra either under quiet conditions or in the presence of noise, by analyzing the temporal resolution ability of the auditory system and the detection of temporal, spectral and amplitude characteristics of conspecific vocalizations.

show abstract

Objective threshold estimation and measurement of the residual background noise in auditory evoked potentials of goldfish

Cited by 8 publications

References 46 publications

Noise-induced hearing loss in zebrafish: investigating structural and functional inner ear damage and recovery

Noise-induced hearing loss in zebrafish: investigating structural and functional inner ear damage and recovery

Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish

Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About