2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijsom.2013.056143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking organisational units with a human capital management approach using fuzzy TOPSIS: a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, TOPSIS computes the performance ranking by determining the fuzzy positive ideal solution and fuzzy negative ideal solution and the distance of any alternative from them to obtain the relative closeness coefficient. Other researchers who have used fuzzy TOPSIS are such as Tavakoli et al (2013) and Lai and Yussof (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, TOPSIS computes the performance ranking by determining the fuzzy positive ideal solution and fuzzy negative ideal solution and the distance of any alternative from them to obtain the relative closeness coefficient. Other researchers who have used fuzzy TOPSIS are such as Tavakoli et al (2013) and Lai and Yussof (2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movahedi et al (2015) used PCA in identifying the principal components of human capital management (HCM) and reported that EE and workforce optimization are its main components. Tavakoli et al (2017) relied on PCA-DEA-SEM approach PCA-DEA in evaluating the performance of a company by HCM approach, with the consideration of EE as one of the HCM indicators based on leadership practices and EE, knowledge accessibility, workforce optimization and learning capabilities as inputs and organizational commitment as an output. Azadeh et al (2011) also used PCA-DEA integration to assess the productivity of personnel, and their impact on efficiency, based on a set of quantitative inputs as well as skills and abilities, job qualifications, responsibility, innovation, motivation and relationships as outputs.…”
Section: Psychological Empowerment As a Determinant Of Employee Engag...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Aristovnik et al (2016) assessed organizational performance based on the relationship between job satisfaction and several performance-related indicators in Slovenia. Tavakoli et al (2017) used Fuzzy-DEA to determine the factors affecting organizational units efficiency in Iran based on human capital practices. As an extension of these studies, Rani and Mat (2020) relied on human resource management (HRM) practices and employee commitment as inputs and outputs, respectively, in evaluating the performance of hotel workers in Malaysia.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The philosophy behind the use of fuzzy multi-state network for the same was probably to measure the labour capacity and its impact on workstation performance with utmost accuracy in presence of the uncertainties in human performance (Azadeh et al, 2014). In another study, Tavakoli et al (2013) had shown that TOPSIS technique could be a better option for ranking the performances of employees even while using linguistic variables and presence of high level of information asymmetry. Alternatively, some of the earlier researches used the data envelope analysis approach of fuzzy modelling for measuring employees' performance index (Arabzad et al, 2013).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%