2002
DOI: 10.1080/10963758.2002.10696728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking of U.S. Hospitality Undergraduate Programs: 2000–2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 69 hospitality programs were chosen because (a) they were visited by the 72 hospitality recruiters for college recruitments or (b) they were the premium members in the International Council on Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Education Organization. These selected institutions included 11 out of the 13 top hospitality programs in Withiam's (1997) report, 23 out of the top 29 hospitality undergraduate programs in Brizek and Khan's (2002) study, and 10 out of the 11 leading hospitality programs suggested by Harris et al (2006).…”
Section: Population Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 69 hospitality programs were chosen because (a) they were visited by the 72 hospitality recruiters for college recruitments or (b) they were the premium members in the International Council on Hotel, Restaurant, and Institutional Education Organization. These selected institutions included 11 out of the 13 top hospitality programs in Withiam's (1997) report, 23 out of the top 29 hospitality undergraduate programs in Brizek and Khan's (2002) study, and 10 out of the 11 leading hospitality programs suggested by Harris et al (2006).…”
Section: Population Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward the end of 1980's, Calnan (1988) (Kent et al, 1993). More recent research was conducted to rank U.S. hospitality undergraduate programs by hospitality program administrators with some objective measures such as curriculum, faculty, student, resources, and alumni (Brizek & Khan, 2002). Gould and Bojanic (2002) solicited opinions of industry recruiters to rank hospitality programs in the United States.…”
Section: Program Ranking In Hospitality and Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on various criteria and approaches, several researchers have made a good progress in ranking academic institutions that offered hospitality and tourism programs (Brizek & Khan, 2002;Calnan, 1988;Gould & Bojanic, 2002;Kent, Lian, Khan, & Anene, 1993, 1994.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study evaluated syllabi of the MICE course offerings at the top 25 ranked hospitality programs in the United States as determined by a 2001 study by Brizek and Khan (2002), which is the most recently published article providing rankings of hospitality and tourism undergraduate programs. While this ranking was not a comprehensive listing of U.S. hospitality programs that offer a convention curriculum, this list was utilized in order to eliminate any potential sampling bias.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the sample was taken from the Brizek and Khan (2002) study of ranked U.S. hospitality programs in which several prominent schools did not participate. In addition, the sample consisted of larger, more research-oriented programs in the United States.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%