2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranking Farms Using Quantitative Indicators of Sustainability: The 4Agro Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Neste sentido, o manejo correto do solo, a aplicação adequada de defensivos agrícolas e o uso racional da fertilização química são elementos que contribuem para o uso racional dos recursos naturais e, portanto, para a dimensão ambiental (Cruz et al, 2008;Lopes, 2001;Santos & Cândido, 2013). Tais indicadores revestem-se de especial importância em avaliações de sustentabilidade de sistemas agrícolas, dado o papel dos agricultores na manutenção dos serviços ambientais (Bertocchi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sustentabilidade Agrícola: Conceito Desafios E Mensuraçãounclassified
“…Neste sentido, o manejo correto do solo, a aplicação adequada de defensivos agrícolas e o uso racional da fertilização química são elementos que contribuem para o uso racional dos recursos naturais e, portanto, para a dimensão ambiental (Cruz et al, 2008;Lopes, 2001;Santos & Cândido, 2013). Tais indicadores revestem-se de especial importância em avaliações de sustentabilidade de sistemas agrícolas, dado o papel dos agricultores na manutenção dos serviços ambientais (Bertocchi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sustentabilidade Agrícola: Conceito Desafios E Mensuraçãounclassified
“…Nonetheless, several authors have developed indicators that include the three pillars of sustainability 6 (Bertocchi et al, 2016;Paracchini et al, 2011;Dantsis et al, 2010; Gomez-Limon and Sanchez-Fernandez, 2010; Rodrigues et al, 2010;Meul et al, 2008;Zahm et al, 2008;Van Cauwenbergh et al, 2007;van Calker et al, 2006;López-Ridaura et al, 2005;Rasul and Thapa, 2004;Tzilivakis and Lewis, 2004;Häni et al, 2003, etc. ).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, SAFA turns out to be a useful benchmark paradigm for highlighting the differences between the different approaches and for making the assessment results more comparable [20]. A comparison of several applications for the assessment of sustainability (IDEA-Indicateurs de Durabilité des Exploitations Agricoles or Farm Sustainability Indicators; RISE-Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation model; SAFA; SOSTAR -analysis of farm technical efficiency and impacts on environmental and economic sustainability, MOTIFS-Monitoring Tool for Integrated Farm Sustainability and 4Agro) at farms in Northern Italy has made it possible to study the choice of indicators, the availability of data and the involvement of stakeholders, as well as to add more evaluation scales for agriculture (the environment, society, the economy and governance) [21][22][23].…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%