Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3477495.3532050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RankFlow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pair-wise contrastive learning. Most of the existing retrieval methods (Qin et al, 2022;Hossain et al, 2020) obtain the relevant documents by ranking the candidate documents based on the similarity to the query. They only minimize the negative log-likelihood of the positive documents, implicitly optimizing their model to binary classify the documents.…”
Section: Multi-granularity Contrastive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pair-wise contrastive learning. Most of the existing retrieval methods (Qin et al, 2022;Hossain et al, 2020) obtain the relevant documents by ranking the candidate documents based on the similarity to the query. They only minimize the negative log-likelihood of the positive documents, implicitly optimizing their model to binary classify the documents.…”
Section: Multi-granularity Contrastive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Rieder et al’s (2018) mixed-methods methodology to study patterns of change over time on social media, we generated files that contained the top 20 most shared unique YouTube videos on Twitter every day over the period of 4 months (February–May 2020). To visualise our data and identify patterns in how users shared YouTube videos on Twitter, we used the RankFlow tool (Rieder, 2016) – which creates flow diagrams that make changes over time easily observable – and created rank flow morphologies for every month of the study period. Since we wanted to identify patterns of ‘inauthentic’ behaviour in how YouTube content creators share videos on Twitter (our RQ2-A), we were interested not only in how many times a YouTube video was shared on any given day, but in the relationship between the number of times a video was tweeted and the number of unique users that shared that video.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%