2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ranked batch-mode active learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare ITAL with a variety of baselines and competing methods, including SUD [33], TCAL [5], RBMAL [3], and the method of Brinker [2] referred to as "border div" in the following. All these native BMAL methods have been described in Section 2.…”
Section: Competitor Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compare ITAL with a variety of baselines and competing methods, including SUD [33], TCAL [5], RBMAL [3], and the method of Brinker [2] referred to as "border div" in the following. All these native BMAL methods have been described in Section 2.…”
Section: Competitor Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to batch-mode active learning (BMAL), most existing methods employ some combination of the criteria uncertainty, diversity, and density: Brinker [2] proposes to select samples close to the decision boundary, while enforcing diversity by minimizing the maximum cosine similarity of samples within the batch. Similarly, "Sampling by Uncertainty and Density (SUD)" [33] selects samples maximizing the product of entropy and average cosine similarity to the nearest neighbors and "Ranked Batch-mode Active Learning (RBMAL)" [3] constructs a batch by successively adding samples with high uncertainty and low maximum similarity to any other already selected sample. "Triple Criteria Active Learning (TCAL)" [5], on the other hand, first selects a subset of uncertain samples near the decision boundary, divides them into k clusters, and chooses that sample from each cluster that has the minimum average distance to all other samples in the same cluster.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Haertel, et al [31] proposed a parallel active learning method which can eliminate the wait time with minimal staleness. Thiago et al [32] introduce a ranked batch-mode active learning framework to reduce the manual labeling delays. However, these methods do not actually represent or reason about costs.…”
Section: Reduce Image Annotation Cost In Active Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, BMAL only uses an active selection strategy based on a single uncertainty index or diversity index when screening samples, which leads to considerable information redundancy in the labeled samples and unnecessary labeling costs. Cardoso [38] proposed the ranked batch-mode active learning (RBMAL) framework, which overcomes the limitations of traditional BMAL methods and generates an optimized ranked list to determine the priority of samples being labeled. Therefore, the RBMAL method has higher flexibility than the classic methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%