2010
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2010)16:1(66)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rank Correlation Method for Evaluating Manual Pavement Distress Data Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that current manual evaluation methods operationally used by transportation management agencies rely on only visual observation to estimate distress rates (e.g., estimate the length of the cracks), which is highly subjective [21]. However, inspectors of this research physically measured the distress rates to collect ground reference data, which is objective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that current manual evaluation methods operationally used by transportation management agencies rely on only visual observation to estimate distress rates (e.g., estimate the length of the cracks), which is highly subjective [21]. However, inspectors of this research physically measured the distress rates to collect ground reference data, which is objective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual data collection used in many countries is slow and it provides poor data [1]. The most common method of measurement is still the geodetic method, with the use of a total station in combination with Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DSMs, the discrepancy between the manual depth measurement and the DAT-based depth measurement could be from errors in either method. However, rutting depth measured by different inspectors can exhibit a high degree of variability (Bogus et al 2010) because this method relies on subjective visual observation. These results can be interpreted to indicate that the DAT-based rutting measurement method is more accurate than manual method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite safety precautions (safety training and high-visibility garments), this can still be dangerous work, especially in high traffic volume sections. In addition, data collected by different inspectors can exhibit a high degree of variability (Bogus et al 2010) More recently, many sophisticated and automated devices integrated with high-performance sensors (e.g. 3D laser scanners) have gradually been developed for rutting assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%