2009
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2009.2030223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range-Only Positioning of a Deep-Diving Autonomous Underwater Vehicle From a Surface Ship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all these works are mathematical developments and only show some simulations. On the other hand, in other works such as [4] and [6] the authors present some field test results to localize an underwater target using rangeonly methods, but in their case, they do not present a general study to find the best parameters for target localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these works are mathematical developments and only show some simulations. On the other hand, in other works such as [4] and [6] the authors present some field test results to localize an underwater target using rangeonly methods, but in their case, they do not present a general study to find the best parameters for target localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other works in acoustic cooperative underwater navigation have emerged for fusing OWTT-based relative ranges between teams of vehicles [1,2,8,10,16,17,25]. These methods, however, generally trade off between offline and consistent, or real-time and inconsistent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navigation with a single, fixed beacon whose position is known a priori has been reported using several different estimation techniques-a least squares approach in [21] and [1], and a vehicle-based extended Kalman filter (EKF) in [16] and [10]. Navigation with respect to a moving beacon whose position is not known a priori is reported in [17] using a nonlinear least mean square method; in [6] using a maximum likelihood method; and in [27] using a centralized EKF. However, each of these methods, as reported, is only structurally tractable for post-processing, though the authors of [17] suggest improvements that would allow for real-time implementations.…”
Section: Single-beacon Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navigation with respect to a moving beacon whose position is not known a priori is reported in [17] using a nonlinear least mean square method; in [6] using a maximum likelihood method; and in [27] using a centralized EKF. However, each of these methods, as reported, is only structurally tractable for post-processing, though the authors of [17] suggest improvements that would allow for real-time implementations.…”
Section: Single-beacon Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%