2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Range Design Considerations Based on Behavior of Antimony and Lead under Dynamic Loading Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nominal characteristics of this ammunition are given in Table 1. The projectile comprises 53% lead, 0.5% antimony and 46.5% steel penetrator (Martin et al, 2017). Note that this ammunition has essentially the same design parameters as the NATO SS109 and the United States M855 ball cartridges.…”
Section: Ballistic Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nominal characteristics of this ammunition are given in Table 1. The projectile comprises 53% lead, 0.5% antimony and 46.5% steel penetrator (Martin et al, 2017). Note that this ammunition has essentially the same design parameters as the NATO SS109 and the United States M855 ball cartridges.…”
Section: Ballistic Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nominal characteristics of this ammunition are also given in Table 1. The projectile comprises 99% lead and 1% antimony (Martin et al, 2017). Note that this ammunition is very similar to the Australian 7.62 mm F4 ball ammunition (Australian Munitions, 2017b).…”
Section: Ballistic Field Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%