2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel vs. cediranib-olaparib (continuous or intermittent schedule) in platinum-resistant high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the recent GY004 phase III (NCT02446600) study demonstrated similar activity with cediranib plus olaparib compared to standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in platinum sensitive recurrent EOC, the study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS with median PFS of 10.3, 8.2 and 10.4 months for SOC chemotherapy, olaparib monotherapy and cediranib/olaparib combination respectively [ 52 ]. The combination of olaparib and cediranib has also been evaluated in platinum resistant disease in the BAROCCO (NCT03314740) and OCTOVA (NCT03117933) and AMBITION (NCT03699449) clinical trials [ 53 54 55 ]. Whilst no significant improvement in PFS was observed with either continuous or intermittent cediranib with olaparib compared with weekly paclitaxel within BAROCCO, continuous administration demonstrated a trend for improved PFS compared to chemotherapy (5.8 months vs. 3.1 months, hazard ratio [HR]=0.76; 90% confidence interval [CI]=0.50–1.14) [ 53 ].…”
Section: Molecularly Targeted Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the recent GY004 phase III (NCT02446600) study demonstrated similar activity with cediranib plus olaparib compared to standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy in platinum sensitive recurrent EOC, the study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS with median PFS of 10.3, 8.2 and 10.4 months for SOC chemotherapy, olaparib monotherapy and cediranib/olaparib combination respectively [ 52 ]. The combination of olaparib and cediranib has also been evaluated in platinum resistant disease in the BAROCCO (NCT03314740) and OCTOVA (NCT03117933) and AMBITION (NCT03699449) clinical trials [ 53 54 55 ]. Whilst no significant improvement in PFS was observed with either continuous or intermittent cediranib with olaparib compared with weekly paclitaxel within BAROCCO, continuous administration demonstrated a trend for improved PFS compared to chemotherapy (5.8 months vs. 3.1 months, hazard ratio [HR]=0.76; 90% confidence interval [CI]=0.50–1.14) [ 53 ].…”
Section: Molecularly Targeted Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of olaparib and cediranib has also been evaluated in platinum resistant disease in the BAROCCO (NCT03314740) and OCTOVA (NCT03117933) and AMBITION (NCT03699449) clinical trials [ 53 54 55 ]. Whilst no significant improvement in PFS was observed with either continuous or intermittent cediranib with olaparib compared with weekly paclitaxel within BAROCCO, continuous administration demonstrated a trend for improved PFS compared to chemotherapy (5.8 months vs. 3.1 months, hazard ratio [HR]=0.76; 90% confidence interval [CI]=0.50–1.14) [ 53 ]. In the OCTOVA trial, cediranib and olaparib treatment significantly increased PFS compared to olaparib monotherapy (median PFS 5.4 vs. 3.7 months, HR=0.70; 95% CI=0.57–0.86) and was numerically superior to weekly paclitaxel (median PFS 3.9 months), although the trial was not designed to compare these treatment arms directly [ 55 ].…”
Section: Molecularly Targeted Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have tried a variety of therapeutic regimens, including nonplatinum-based therapy, to prolong PFI and multiple drug combinations ( 39 ). The Best Approach in Recurrent-Ovarian-Cancer-with Cediranib-Olaparib (BAROCCO) trial showed that the combination of cediranib–olaparib did not significantly improve PFS in platinum-resistant patients compared with paclitaxel ( 40 ). Nonetheless, a few studies indicated that the underlying mechanisms about the initiation and progression of platinum-resistant in ovarian cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest randomized phase II trial compared PFS in weekly paclitaxel vs. cediranib-olaparib in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The results demonstrated that cediranib-olaparib oral doublet was active and might offer a nonchemotherapy option in these population, though combination of cediranib-olaparib was not superior to chemotherapy in PFS [ 121 ]. A phase II trial NSGO-AVANOVA2/ENGOT-ov24 investigated niraparib plus bevacizumab for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer [ 122 ].…”
Section: Future Development Of Anti-angiogenic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%