2021
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Tools for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract: Objective The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of 2 educational tools for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing a newly developed video tool, including storylines and testimonials, combined with a written booklet to the same written booklet alone. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Our primary outcome was disease knowledge. Secondary outcomes were decisional conflict, self‐efficacy, effective health care management, and satisfaction. Outcomes were measured b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty‐four articles were then further assessed by examining the full texts, with 25 articles being excluded, of which 6 studies (Ambrosino et al, 2020; Mary et al, 2019; Myasoedova et al, 2019; Pers et al, 2021; Taylor‐Gjevre et al, 2018; de Thurah et al, 2018) were excluded because the data were not accessible, although these studies were relevant to the subject matter of our study. Finally, a total of 9 randomised control trials (Katz et al, 2018; Kuusalo et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2021; Lopez‐Olivo et al, 2020; Miedany et al, 2016; Poggenborg et al, 2021; Shigaki et al, 2013; Song et al, 2020; Zuidema et al, 2019) were included in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty‐four articles were then further assessed by examining the full texts, with 25 articles being excluded, of which 6 studies (Ambrosino et al, 2020; Mary et al, 2019; Myasoedova et al, 2019; Pers et al, 2021; Taylor‐Gjevre et al, 2018; de Thurah et al, 2018) were excluded because the data were not accessible, although these studies were relevant to the subject matter of our study. Finally, a total of 9 randomised control trials (Katz et al, 2018; Kuusalo et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2021; Lopez‐Olivo et al, 2020; Miedany et al, 2016; Poggenborg et al, 2021; Shigaki et al, 2013; Song et al, 2020; Zuidema et al, 2019) were included in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These 9 randomised controlled trials were published from 2013–2021. Four studies (Katz et al, 2018; Lee et al, 2021; Lopez‐Olivo et al, 2020; Shigaki et al, 2013) were conducted in the USA, and the other studies were conducted in China (Song et al, 2020), Denmark (Poggenborg et al, 2021), Finland (Kuusalo et al, 2020), Netherlands (Zuidema et al, 2019) and UK (Miedany et al, 2016). The total sample size was 1501 patients, among which 750 participated in the e‐health group, while 751 participated in the control group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of more activated patients are substantial, and the benefits can last for several years (Hibbard et al, 2015). It is therefore important to integrate information about patients' knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management (Hibbard et al, 2015) in the follow-up of patients in rheumatology care (Lopez-Olivo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient education can be provided in different formats such as individually, to patients in groups, in written materials, videos (des Bordes et al, 2018;Lopez-Olivo et al, 2020;Stenberg et al, 2016) or as avatar-based technology (Wonggom et al, 2019). Studies show that self-administered educational materials in clinical settings improve patients' disease knowledge (Lopez-Olivo et al, 2020) and that the Internet is widely used to search for health information (des Bordes et al, 2018;Lopez-Olivo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation