2018
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201806-365oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomized Controlled Trial of Health Coaching for Vulnerable Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Abstract: These results help inform expectations regarding the limitations and benefits of health coaching for patients with COPD. They may be useful to health policy experts in assessing the potential value of reimbursement and incentives for health coaching-type activities for patients with chronic disease. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02234284).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 One of the advantages of EBIP is its face-to-face nature and the consequent opportunity to address individual problems and integrate them to the process. 21 However, this program may have limited applicability in regions where the number of nurses is limited or where home visits are problematic due to security. The subsequently increased probability of noncompliance to the determined home visit and phone appointment schedule will impair the effectiveness of the study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 One of the advantages of EBIP is its face-to-face nature and the consequent opportunity to address individual problems and integrate them to the process. 21 However, this program may have limited applicability in regions where the number of nurses is limited or where home visits are problematic due to security. The subsequently increased probability of noncompliance to the determined home visit and phone appointment schedule will impair the effectiveness of the study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14-12872) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02234284). The study protocol 48 and primary outcomes 47 have been previously published.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direction of change for the primary outcomes in the AIR study, such as disease-specific quality of life and exacerbations, were positive for the coached group, but differences did not reach statistical significance over usual care. 70 This result may suggest that improved inhaler technique and adherence are only one of the factors required to move outcomes.…”
Section: Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no difference between the two groups in terms of first respiratory hospitalization or allcause death. A similar trial, the AIR study, randomized 192 participants with moderate to severe COPD to receive health coaching by college graduates without any medical training versus usual care and showed mild improvement in quality of life and depression symptoms but no difference in COPD hospitalizations (104,105).…”
Section: Disease Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%