“…No association was reported between extramedullary DHS and derotation screw alone or with trochanteric wiring [81], Minimally invasive DHS and conventional DHS [62], and weight bearing. The studies that compare different types of extramedullary and intramedullary implants report facilitators of weight bearing favouring PFNA-II (compared with dynamic hip locking plates (DHLP)) [95], PFNA (compared with DHS) [52,65,72,94,96], PFN (compared with DHS) [68,76,77], short PFN (compared with DHS) [78], Mini-invasive static nail (compared with conventional DHS) [56], and gamma nail (compared with DHS) [71]. No difference between extramedullary and intramedullary implants was reported in two studies [54,85].…”