Objective: To compare the blood loss between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. Design of study: It was a randomized controlled trial. Study duration and settings: This study was carried out at the Orthopedic Departments of Combined Military Hospital Lahore and Rawalpindi from Jan 2016 to March 2018. Methodology: Patients of both the genders were involved this study who had age in the rage of 40–80 years undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty for degenerative conditions like osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. These patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups. Patients in IA group received intra-articular tranexamic acid while those in IV group received intravenous tranexamic acid. From all the patients, a written signed consent was taken. Findings: Females were predominant with male-to-female ratio of 1:3.7. The mean age of the patients was 67.3 ± 8.2 years while the mean BMI was 30.9 ± 2.9 Kg/m2. Majority (n = 191, 95.5%) of the patients had osteoarthritis while remaining 9 (4.5%) patients had rheumatoid arthritis. There was no statistically significant difference between intra-articular and intra-venous administration of tranexamic acid in terms of mean post-operative hemoglobin (9.93 ± 1.14 vs. 9.87 ± 1.26 g/dL; p-value = 0.724), mean post-operative hematocrit (34.8 ± 1.66 vs. 34.73 ± 1.27%; p-value = 0.594), and mean fall in hemoglobin (2.27 ± 0.34 vs. 2.25 ± 0.30 g/dL; p-value = 0.587) and hematocrit (2.34 ± 0.94 vs. 2.46 ± 0.28%; p-value = 0.216). Conclusion: Intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid was found to be as effective and safe as intra-venous administration in reducing blood loss in primary total knee arthroplasty. Due to convenience, the use of intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid after primary TKA may be considered in future practice.

Objective: To compare dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in patients with pertrochanteric fractures in terms of frequency of infection and union. Study Design: It was a randomized controlled trial. Settings: This study was carried at Department of Orthopedic Surgery, DHQ Teaching Hospital Faisalabad-Pakistan. Duration: 1 year from March 2017 to March 2018. Methodology: This study involved 60 patients belonging both genders having age between 20-70 years undergoing pertrochanteric fracture surgery. By random division of these patients, two treatment groups were made; Group-A (n=30) patients underwent fracture fixation with DHS while those in Group-B (n=30) were treated with proximal femoral nailing. Outcome variable was frequency of infection (diagnosed clinically upon appearance of any two of the following signs within 4 weeks after operation; redness around the wound, serosangious discharge and fever >100 o F) and union (clinical and radiological) at 12 weeks follow-up that was noted for making comparison between the two groups. A written informed consent was taken from all the participating patients. Results: The mean age of the patients was 54.80±8.57 years. There was a female predominance with male to female ratio of 1:1.4. The frequency of union was significantly higher (86.7% vs. 46.7%; p=0.001) while the frequency of infection was significantly lower (0.0% vs. 30.0%; p<0.001) in patients managed with PFN as compared to conventional practice of DHS regardless of patient's age and gender. Conclusion: Proximal femoral nail was found superior to DHS in terms of significantly higher frequency of union and decreased risk of infection in patients with pertrochanteric fractures regardless of patient's age and gender which advocates preferred use of proximal femoral nail in future practice provided the necessary hardware and surgical skills are available.

Objective: To determine the radiological, functional, and anatomical outcome in patients with osteoarthritic knee undergoing high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Design of study: Descriptive case series. Study duration and settings: The present study was a descriptive case series carried out at the Orthopedic Departments of District Head Quarter Hospital Faisalabad affiliated with Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad from Jan 2014 to March 2018. Methodology: This study involved 40 patients of both genders, aged between 40 and 65 years having advanced degenerative disease of knee limited to medial compartment of joint. These patients were treated by medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and outcome was evaluated after 5 years of surgery in terms of radiological knee mechanics, functional outcome scores, and arthroscopic evidence of cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment. A signed written consent was taken from every patient. Findings: There was a female predominance with a male-to-female ratio of 1:4. The mean age of the patients was 53.2 ± 6.9 years. The values of the radiographic parameters significantly changed from pre-operative condition after HTO; mechanical tibiofemoral angle [MTFA, (−8.1 ± 1.2° vs. 2.5 ± 1.2°; p-value < 0.0001)], tibial plateau inclination [TPI, (5.3 ± 1.1° vs. 3.4 ± 1.1°; p-value < 0.0001)], knee joint line orientation relative to the ground [G-KJLO, (0.3 ± 0.1° vs. 4.6 ± 1.5°; p-value < 0.0001)], and ankle joint line orientation relative to the ground [G-AJLO (8.3 ± 3.2° vs. 2.3 ± 1.7°; p-value < 0.0001)]. There was significant improvement in patient’s functional status; KOOS-ADL score (45.5 ± 7.8 vs. 73.7 ± 8.6; p-value < 0.0001), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (42.4 ± 6.9 vs. 68.5 ± 12.7; p-value < 0.0001), International Knee Society (IKS) score (149.4 ± 11.9 vs. 179.4 ± 10.2; p-value < 0.0001), Knee Society Score [KSS, (54.2 ± 5.6 vs. 69.7 ± 12.7; p-value < 0.0001)], and Hospital for Special Surgery [HSS, (50.8 ± 3.3 vs. 64.8 ± 10.7; p-value < 0.0001)]. 42.5% patients showed excellent regeneration of femoral and 30.0% patients showed excellent regeneration of tibial cartilage in the medial compartment. Conclusion: By significantly alternating the knee biomechanics, HTO was found to unload the medial compartment leading to regeneration of the articular cartilage and significant improvement in patient’s symptoms and quality of life. It is therefore recommended in the management of patients with arthritic changes limited to medial compartment only.