2014
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised clinical trial: study of escalating doses of NRL001 given in rectal suppositories of different weights

Abstract: The regression analysis concluded that the doses were dose proportional.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PK results in this study were comparable with the same dose (10 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository) in the other Phase I studies , although the results for AUC 0–tz , AUC 0–∞ , C max , T max and t ½ in the current study were generally slightly higher than in the other Phase I studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PK results in this study were comparable with the same dose (10 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository) in the other Phase I studies , although the results for AUC 0–tz , AUC 0–∞ , C max , T max and t ½ in the current study were generally slightly higher than in the other Phase I studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…NRL001 suppositories have also been shown to be well tolerated in healthy subjects in repeated daily doses up to 15 mg . Increasing NRL001 concentrations were associated with decreased heart rate (HR) in Phase I studies in healthy volunteers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRL001 has also demonstrated an excellent safety profile in preclinical (Norgine, data on file) and Phase I clinical trials. [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NRL001 is undertaking its journey through this complex process and this supplement describes the early Phase I work together with a meta-analysis of the cardiovascular data from these studies; see Table 1 for a list of the studies reported [25][26][27][28][29]. In addition, the Phase II clinical study design is presented [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that NRL001 is worthy of clinical investigation in Phase II patient populations with passive faecal incontinence. [25] A randomised, controlled, crossover study to investigate the safety and response of 1R,2S-methoxamine hydrochloride (NRL001) on anal function in healthy volunteers SUSD [26] Randomised clinical trial: study of escalating doses of NRL001 given in rectal suppositories of different weights SAGE [27] A randomised, controlled, crossover study to investigate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of 1R,2S-methoxamine hydrochloride (NRL001) in healthy elderly subjects SURD [28] A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-group, doseescalating, repeat dose study in healthy volunteers to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of the once daily rectal application of NRL001 suppositories for 14 days Meta-analysis [29] Meta-analysis for cardiovascular effects of NRL001 after rectal application in healthy volunteers…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%