2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-022-01116-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random walks on hyperbolic spaces: Concentration inequalities and probabilistic Tits alternative

Abstract: The goal of this article is two-fold: in a first part, we prove Azuma–Hoeffding type concentration inequalities around the drift for the displacement of non-elementary random walks on hyperbolic spaces. For a proper hyperbolic space M, we obtain explicit bounds that depend only on M, the size of support of the measure as in the classical case of sums of independent random variables, and on the norm of the driving probability measure in the left regular representation of the group of isometries. We obtain unifo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4.3.1] for every λ < α, we have I * (λ) = Λ(λ), where I * is the Fenchel-Legendre transform of I. But since the second-order term σ 2 µ /2 in the second-order expansion of Λ at 0 (given by Theorem 1.1) is positive, it follows that the Fenchel-Legendre transforms of I * and Λ coincides in a neighborhood of ℓ µ , i.e., 1) . This is in line with the recent work [1] where, under additional assumptions, the appearing constants are made explicit (e.g.…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4.3.1] for every λ < α, we have I * (λ) = Λ(λ), where I * is the Fenchel-Legendre transform of I. But since the second-order term σ 2 µ /2 in the second-order expansion of Λ at 0 (given by Theorem 1.1) is positive, it follows that the Fenchel-Legendre transforms of I * and Λ coincides in a neighborhood of ℓ µ , i.e., 1) . This is in line with the recent work [1] where, under additional assumptions, the appearing constants are made explicit (e.g.…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was then verified in [22] that this solution can be extended to the case when X is non-proper and also in [1] that ψ could be defined on the whole compactification X h while preserving the boundedness of ψ. This is equivalent to finding a cocycle σ 0 : G × X h → R with constant drift equal to ℓ µ , i.e., σ 0 (g, x)dµ(g) = ℓ µ for every x ∈ X h , such that the following identity holds for every…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations