2015
DOI: 10.1214/13-aop867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random walks in cones

Abstract: We study the asymptotic behavior of a multidimensional random walk in a general cone. We find the tail asymptotics for the exit time and prove integral and local limit theorems for a random walk conditioned to stay in a cone. The main step in the proof consists in constructing a positive harmonic function for our random walk under minimal moment restrictions on the increments. For the proof of tail asymptotics and integral limit theorems, we use a strong approximation of random walks by Brownian motion. For th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
368
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
368
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference with [6, Theorem 3] is that we find the limit for conditional distributions without determining the asymptotic behavior ofP r λ (τ > 1). (Recall once again that [6,Theorem 3] is proven under the assumption r = h λ a for some fixed a ∈ W .) Fix some ∈ (0, 1/2) and define the stopping time Proof.…”
Section: Appendix B Invariance Principles For Random Walks In Weyl Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main difference with [6, Theorem 3] is that we find the limit for conditional distributions without determining the asymptotic behavior ofP r λ (τ > 1). (Recall once again that [6,Theorem 3] is proven under the assumption r = h λ a for some fixed a ∈ W .) Fix some ∈ (0, 1/2) and define the stopping time Proof.…”
Section: Appendix B Invariance Principles For Random Walks In Weyl Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organization of these sections is described in Subsection 3.8. Many of our technical estimates rely on strong approximation techniques and on a refinement of recent results on random walks in Weyl chambers and on cones [6,8]. We can either think of L as being defined on L 2 (R + ) with zero boundary conditions at zero, or as being defined on L 2 (R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the WienerHopf factorization is not suited for studying the exit time probabilities for random walks in R d or walks based on dependent variables. Alternative approaches have been developed recently: we refer to [8,9,11,29]. For the results (1.4) and (1.5) we rely, on the one hand, upon these developments, and, on the other hand, upon a key strong approximation result for dependent random variables established separately in [17].…”
Section: P4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to Spitzer [28], Iglehart [20], Bolthausen [5], Bertoin and Doney [2], Doney [10], Borovkov [3,4], Vatutin and Wachtel [30], Caravenna [7] and to references therein. Random walks in R d conditioned to stay in a cone have been considered in Shimura [27], Garbit [14], Echelsbacher and König [11] and Denisov and Wachtel [8,9]. The case of Markov chains with bounded jumps were considered by Varapoulos [29] who obtained upper and lower bounds for the exit probability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the studies on the subject of fluctuation was quite sparse a few years ago. Thanks to the approach of Denisov and Wachtel (2015) for random walks in Euclidean spaces and motivated by branching processes, I. Grama, E. Le Page and M. Peigné recently progressed for invertible matrices (Grama et al, 2014). Here we propose to develop the same strategy for matrices with positive entries by using Hennion and Hervé (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%