his article reviews the major contributions in several issues in the literature T of futures markets. In Section I the theory of hedging and speculation is discussed. Section I1 is a discussion of the determination of the basis in inventory and noninventory markets. Section I11 deals with the voluminous studies on the behavior of future prices. The issues of the existence of a bias in futures prices, the random character of the prices, their distribution and the determination of their variances, and the equilibrium pricing of futures contracts within the capital market are addressed. The last section reviews the effects of futures trading on the cash market and the informational role of the futures markets.Special emphasis is given to the empirical evidence. Since a comprehensive review of the literature up to the 1970s is provided in Gray and Rutledge (1971), the emphasis is placed on the voluminous publications from 1970 to date. Leuthold and Tomek (1979) is an excellent review of the developments in livestock futures.I am grateful for comments on an earlier draft KAMARA is generally suboptimal; and (b) in a case of a good for which a futures market does not exist, a "cross-hedge" is possible whenever the covariance between the futures and spot prices is different from zero. Peck (1975) and Rolfo (1980) made empirical studies of the (mean variance) optimal hedge. Peck examined the case of an egg producer facing price uncertainty, given that the production is fixed and there is a basis risk. She found that during 1971-1973, for a risk-aversion parameter between 0.001 and 0.1, hedging 75-95% of the output was optimal.Rolfo (1980) examined the case of cocoa producer facing both price and quantity uncertainty and found the optimal hedge to be 61-94% of expected output, for a risk-aversion parameter between 1 and 00. The closer to zero is the correlation between price and quantity distributions, the higher is the optimal hedging ratio. For a risk-aversion parameter below unity, the optimal ratio fell dramatically. Thus, the optimal hedging ratio for a producer facing quantity and price uncertainty is generally well below that of a producer facing only price uncertainty. These results may help to understand why some futures markets are not widely used by farmers.As for the speculators, Anderson and Danthine (1980a), as well as other studies, showed that they will be short (long) when the futures price is above (below) the expected cash price. In a case where the speculator trades in several assets with uncertain and dependent returns, Anderson and Danthine (1981) showed that the speculator's optimal position in any given contract depends on the complete vector of expected returns, the variance-covariance matrix of futures prices, and his risk aversion. Also, as expected in the mean variance framework which they use, in a case in which the speculators agree on the first and second moments of the futures prices distribution they all hold the same portfolio of futures. (The same holds for the hedger's portfolio.)Thus, w...