2008
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random sampling strategies in multistatic SAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard bistatic trajectory performed extremely poorly, and did not approach the G M IN bound because of many eigenvalues very near to zero, which was previously observed [8]. This behavior can be attributed to the reasons set forth in guideline 4.…”
Section: E Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The standard bistatic trajectory performed extremely poorly, and did not approach the G M IN bound because of many eigenvalues very near to zero, which was previously observed [8]. This behavior can be attributed to the reasons set forth in guideline 4.…”
Section: E Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Finally, the random-sampling strategy considered in [8] is compared to the deterministic trajectories of this work. In this case, no special strategy or thinking is applied to the problem; the measurement ellipses are generated by a large swarm of SAR vehicles situated randomly above the image at random heights from h = 1 to h = 2 image widths.…”
Section: Random Trajectories Using a Large Number Of Uavsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations