2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2016.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random sampling of bandlimited signals on graphs

Abstract: International audienceWe study the problem of sampling k-bandlimited signals on graphs. We propose two sampling strategies that consist in selecting a small subset of nodes at random. The first strategy is non-adaptive, i.e., independent of the graph structure, and its performance depends on a parameter called the graph coherence. On the contrary, the second strategy is adaptive but yields optimal results. Indeed, no more than O(k log(k)) measurements are sufficient to ensure an accurate and stable recovery of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
236
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
236
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to evaluate our algorithm, we computed the number of errors that SR makes as well as mean precision of the prediction. We compared our results with two other baseline methods 1) Puy et a.l [27] and 2) Rao et al [28], which are the state-of-art methods for graph completion. For the signal recovery step, we used α = 1, ξ = 0.01 and only 60% of the total bases in our algorithm for estimation while other methods required all of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, to evaluate our algorithm, we computed the number of errors that SR makes as well as mean precision of the prediction. We compared our results with two other baseline methods 1) Puy et a.l [27] and 2) Rao et al [28], which are the state-of-art methods for graph completion. For the signal recovery step, we used α = 1, ξ = 0.01 and only 60% of the total bases in our algorithm for estimation while other methods required all of them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7, our result (in red) shows much lower error than the baseline methods. When we used these estimation results to identify whether each participants had elevated amyloid burden (i.e., whether mean of PIB measures over all ROIs is > 1.18), our estimation offered 91.1% accuracy while [27] and [28] provided 88.6% and 87.6%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This clearly yields a matrix completion problem; unfortunately, the setup lies far from incoherent sampling and the matrix versions of restricted isometry property (RIP) that make the low-rank completion argument work in practice [27, 28]. This observation has been made in recent works where collaborative filtering was generalized to the graph domain [29] and where random sampling was introduced for graphs in [30]. However, these approaches, which will serve as excellent baselines, do not exploit the band-limited nature of measurements in frequency space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%