2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2007.00275.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Orientation of Roman Camps

Abstract: An article on the orientation of Roman camps and forts, published in this journal, based its conclusions on faulty statistical analysis. Its only verifiable claim is that the surveyors of Roman camps seem to have preferred orientations within ten degrees of the meridian. Its other claims are not supported. The supposed anomalies of orientation do not need to be explained.introduction This is a critique of a recent contribution to these pages, concerning the orientation of Roman camps and forts (Richardson 2005… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeologists and historians do not usually have basic statistical analysis as part of their tool-kit, and so it is possible for papers without such statistical underpinnings to appear archaeological and classical journals because the basic problems simply are not recognised. [23] Therefore research using statistical tools needs to be published either in a forum used by statistically minded scholars, or else in an open-access environment where they can access and critique the work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeologists and historians do not usually have basic statistical analysis as part of their tool-kit, and so it is possible for papers without such statistical underpinnings to appear archaeological and classical journals because the basic problems simply are not recognised. [23] Therefore research using statistical tools needs to be published either in a forum used by statistically minded scholars, or else in an open-access environment where they can access and critique the work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of astronomical orientations confirms statements made by many Roman writers themselves, and raises the problem of the symbolic meaning of the castrum layout in the Roman world. Recent investigations have shown a clear tendency for the layouts of Roman camps and forts to be oriented to the cardinal points, which is hardly justifiable on strategic grounds (see Richardson 2005; Peterson 2007; Salt 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Recent investigations have been carried out on the orientation of the Roman camps and forts (Richardson 2005) and, although precise indications are also in this case difficult to be obtained due to the relative low number of data sample (see Peterson, 2007, andSalt, 2007) there is a clear tendency to the orientation to the cardinal points which is hardly justifiable with strategic reasons. All in all, in the author's view it is highly desirable that future research may dispose of a complete database of orientations -including temples -in the Roman world, a huge task which however would be of fundamental help towards a re-assessment of the (usually neglected) astronomical knowledge among the Romans, as well as to a better understanding of his connection with the Roman religion and mentality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some of the first publications on this topic (Le Gall 1975;Peterson 2007) refused to accept the existence of any intentionality behind the orientation of Roman towns, a number of later studies suggested the presence of well-defined patterns of orientation in different regions across the Roman Empire (Orfila et al 2014;Richardson 2005). Furthermore, astronomy-based explanations for the orientation of many of the settlements in the studied samples were proposed by a number of authors (González-García and Costa Ferrer 2011;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%