2008
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2008.070010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Access with Multi-Packet Reception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since perfect power control mechanism [9] is adopted for our model, all the packets are presumed to be received with the same mean power at the CR base station. Therefore, each CR user adjusts its transmit power according to the mean power in order to eliminate the near-far effect [4], [7].…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since perfect power control mechanism [9] is adopted for our model, all the packets are presumed to be received with the same mean power at the CR base station. Therefore, each CR user adjusts its transmit power according to the mean power in order to eliminate the near-far effect [4], [7].…”
Section: Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this method, if a received packet has a power which is more than the capture ratio times the sum of the other packets' powers and thermal noise, it captures the receiver and this means that the packet is successfully received [2], [4]. So, the capture probability expression is simply defined as follows [9],…”
Section: Capture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While other workers have addressed SIC in wireless environments [10], here we include the power randomization effect introduced by mobility. The physical environment is assumed to be ideal (although some other workers have considered multiple packet reception under Rayleigh fading [9].) Furthermore receivers are assumed to be able to decode error-free up to the ideal rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the evolution of terminals' queuing processes over time is coupled with each other, analytical models, even approximate ones, that have been developed have mostly suffered from the curse of dimensionality. As good approximations, there are some analytical queuing models for buffered terminals in S-ALOHA systems in [15]- [17]. However, none of these models considers correlated traffic arrivals or window-based backoff with retry limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%