2011
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2011.2172230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Queuing Performance of Multichannel S-ALOHA Systems With Correlated Arrivals

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper, we examine the queuing performance of terminals in a multichannel centralized S-ALOHA system with a finite terminal population and finite queue size in each terminal, employing a uniform backoff (UB) algorithm with retry limit for collision resolution. The performance evaluations focus on uplink traffic from web browsing, which is modeled as a Markovmodulated Bernoulli process with correlated arrivals. We analyze the system performance in terms of system throughput, mean queue length, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each RA slot period, a non-backlogged device can generate a packet with probability p, which is called packet generation probability. While different packet generation probability for each device may reflect a more practical network scenario, the analysis for the the same packet generation probability introduces the worst case scenario [30]. The two-step RA procedure is described as follows: This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each RA slot period, a non-backlogged device can generate a packet with probability p, which is called packet generation probability. While different packet generation probability for each device may reflect a more practical network scenario, the analysis for the the same packet generation probability introduces the worst case scenario [30]. The two-step RA procedure is described as follows: This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the approximation formula in (22) let us start with the mean value analysis used to prove the Pollaczek-Khinchin formula [27]. In an M/G/1 system without vacations:…”
Section: Appendix D Derivation Of Expected Waiting Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical M/G/1 system E{S Q } = E{S} and the Pollaczek-Khinchin formula follows from (D.1). When server vacations of fixed size T fr are considered it can be proved that E{W } = E{W noV } + T fr /2 [27] and in combination with (D.1) we receive (22) where E{S 2 } can be approximated using (11) as Unlike a typical M/G/1 system, in our case the expected service delay for customers in the queue is not the same as the overall expected service delay, i.e., E{S Q } = E{S}. This is because only queued packets can enjoy the low delay of piggybacking.…”
Section: Appendix D Derivation Of Expected Waiting Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%