2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman microspectroscopy as a tool for microplastic particle analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
134
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While milling produces large particles predominantly [50-100 µm (Eitzen et al, 2018) and 500 µm−2 mm (Kuhn et al, 2018)] sonication rather leads to smaller particles (average Feret's diameter, µ = 30.23 ± 12.14 µm for PS, µ = 32.04 ± 6.53 µm for PLA and µ = 26.56 ± 5.23 µm for PET). The average size of the particles produced through sonication is much closer to the average particle sizes relevant in the environment (Anger et al, 2018) and in weathering studies (∼99% of PLA, PS and PET particles are in the size range 0.6-18 µm) (Lambert and Wagner, 2016).…”
Section: Size Distribution Comparison To Environmental Mp Particles Asupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While milling produces large particles predominantly [50-100 µm (Eitzen et al, 2018) and 500 µm−2 mm (Kuhn et al, 2018)] sonication rather leads to smaller particles (average Feret's diameter, µ = 30.23 ± 12.14 µm for PS, µ = 32.04 ± 6.53 µm for PLA and µ = 26.56 ± 5.23 µm for PET). The average size of the particles produced through sonication is much closer to the average particle sizes relevant in the environment (Anger et al, 2018) and in weathering studies (∼99% of PLA, PS and PET particles are in the size range 0.6-18 µm) (Lambert and Wagner, 2016).…”
Section: Size Distribution Comparison To Environmental Mp Particles Asupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The particles were localized (calculation of centers for Raman measurement) and morphologically analyzed (Feret's diameter min and max, area, ratio of Feret's diameter and percentage of area covered by particle in Feret's box for shape analysis) via image processing using TUM-ParticleTyper (Gaussian windowbased detection, von der Esch et al (submitted), preview in SI Figure 1). Subsequent Raman microspectroscopy (3 mW using TruePower, 532 nm laser, 2.5-20 s measurement time, 20× objective, inserting the determined coordinates by TUM-ParticleTyper via PointViewer) revealed the identity (database search with TrueMatch, for validation see SI Figure 2) of n ∼ 500 randomly selected particles per filter as described by Anger et al (2018). Combining these results an overall compound distribution (desired MP vs. contamination) and a compoundcorrelated size distribution could be determined.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Produced Mp Particlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another alternative method, Raman spectroscopy, can also identify functional groups [30]. Compared to FTIR, Raman spectroscopy has a relatively high identification rate but specific procedures are typically required to be set by researchers [31].…”
Section: Composition and Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ubiquity of microplastics makes fast sampling methods all the more important. Furthermore, micro-FTIR, micro-Raman (i.e., coupling a microscope with an FTIR/Raman) can be used on small sample masses and isolate a single particle for characterization with the assistance of visual images [14,25,30,32].…”
Section: Composition and Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%