2017
DOI: 10.5128/lv27.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rajakarjalainen kuuntelutesti: havainnoijina suomen kielen yliopisto-opiskelijat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research into Karelian has made use of folk linguistic methods but applied and adjusted them to fit this particular linguistic context. Previous research has focused on what Finns with and without Karelian roots mean by the term Karelian, what linguistic features they assign to Karelian, and how they recognise samples of Karelian (Palander 2015;Riionheimo & Palander 2017, 2020Palander & Riionheimo 2018a, 2018b. Furthermore, there are a few studies concerning the language regard of North (Viena) Karelians living in Russia, how they value the Karelian dialects in relation to each other and to the Finnish and Russian languages (Kunnas 2013), and how the North Karelians recognise different varieties of Karelian (Kunnas 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research into Karelian has made use of folk linguistic methods but applied and adjusted them to fit this particular linguistic context. Previous research has focused on what Finns with and without Karelian roots mean by the term Karelian, what linguistic features they assign to Karelian, and how they recognise samples of Karelian (Palander 2015;Riionheimo & Palander 2017, 2020Palander & Riionheimo 2018a, 2018b. Furthermore, there are a few studies concerning the language regard of North (Viena) Karelians living in Russia, how they value the Karelian dialects in relation to each other and to the Finnish and Russian languages (Kunnas 2013), and how the North Karelians recognise different varieties of Karelian (Kunnas 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical and Methodological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaattovaara and Halonen (2015) have applied a recognition task to examine what linguistic features are reported by the respondents to reveal that the sample represents the Helsinki metropolitan area. Riionheimo and Palander (2017), in turn, have used a listening task when investigating to what extent Finnish university students recognised the dialect of Border Karelia. In all these cases the focus has been on recognising the areal background of the speakers, and the present study follows this tradition.…”
Section: The Listening Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%