2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22093504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall Prediction System Using Machine Learning Fusion for Smart Cities

Abstract: Precipitation in any form—such as rain, snow, and hail—can affect day-to-day outdoor activities. Rainfall prediction is one of the challenging tasks in weather forecasting process. Accurate rainfall prediction is now more difficult than before due to the extreme climate variations. Machine learning techniques can predict rainfall by extracting hidden patterns from historical weather data. Selection of an appropriate classification technique for prediction is a difficult job. This research proposes a novel real… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model split the dataset of oral cancer prediction into 70% for training and 30% for testing. After the testing phase, the proposed model used numerous performance statistical parameters [ 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] like Classification Accuracy (CA), Classification Miss Rate (CMR), Specificity, Sensitivity, F1-Score, Positive Predicted Value (PPV), Negative Predicted Value (NPV), False Positive Ratio (FPR), False Negative Ratio (FNR), Likelihood Positive Ratio (LPR), Likelihood Negative Ratio (LNR) and Fowlkes-Mallows Index to evaluate the results of oral cancer prediction. The proposed model represents Ç for predicted true positive values, ø for predicted true negative values, ∂ for predicted false positive values, and µ for predicted false negative values.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model split the dataset of oral cancer prediction into 70% for training and 30% for testing. After the testing phase, the proposed model used numerous performance statistical parameters [ 30 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ] like Classification Accuracy (CA), Classification Miss Rate (CMR), Specificity, Sensitivity, F1-Score, Positive Predicted Value (PPV), Negative Predicted Value (NPV), False Positive Ratio (FPR), False Negative Ratio (FNR), Likelihood Positive Ratio (LPR), Likelihood Negative Ratio (LNR) and Fowlkes-Mallows Index to evaluate the results of oral cancer prediction. The proposed model represents Ç for predicted true positive values, ø for predicted true negative values, ∂ for predicted false positive values, and µ for predicted false negative values.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we applied both AGDPM and AlexNet models on training and testing data, and choose the bestperformed model to predict the single-gene inheritance disorder, mitochondrial inheritance disorder, and multifactorial inheritance disorder. Before the selection of the bestpredicted model, we applied several statistical performance parameters [26]- [31] like Miss classification rate (MCR), sensitivity, specificity, Positive predicted value (PPV), Classification accuracy (CA), Negative predicted value (NPV), False-negative ratio (FNR), f1-score, Likelihood positive ratio (LPR), False positive ratio (FPR), Likelihood negative ratio (LNR) and Fowlkes-Mallows index (FMI) on predicted results. Statistical performance parameters are described below in the form of mathematical equations with respect to the confusion matrix and in these equations ∂, Ø, µ & represents the true-positive, false-positive, true-negative results and false-negative results respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 75 ] Govt. Hospital data Supervised Machine Learning 98.4% Zagrouba et al [ 76 ] Hospital data Supervised Machine Learning 96.79% Ahmed et al [ 77 ], 77 Hospital data Fuzzy Rule Based System 88.78% Sujata et al2019 [ 79 ] PD data from UCI repository Kernel based chaotic Firefly model 90% Dash et al, 2017 [ 80 ] PD data from UCI repository Enhanced chaos-based Firefly model 97.20% Khan et al, 2020 [ 92 ] Hospital data SVM for heart disease prediction 93.33% Rehman et al, 2020 [ 93 ] Hospital data Deep extreme learning machine for Diabetes Type II 92.8% Ghazal et al, 2022 [ 95 ] 1920 images Transfer learning 87.1% Alqudaihi et al, 2021 [ 96 ] Voice data COVID-19 detection by Cough sound using ML Alsunaidi et al, 2021 [ 97 ] Big data Big data analytics for COVID-19 detection Alhaidari et al, 2021 [ 98 ] E-triage data E-triage of COVID-19 patients using e-triage …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%