2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall partitioning into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in a coffee (Coffea arabica L.) monoculture compared to an agroforestry system with Inga densiflora

Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited.In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their pers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results highlight the importance of coffee to provide the environmental function of carbon sequestration and other services widely discussed in other scientific studies, such as conservation of biodiversity, pollination, regulation of microclimate and extremes events, pest control diseases, and cultural services (Perfecto et al, 2005(Perfecto et al, , 2007Philpott et al, 2008aPhilpott et al, , 2008bMéndez et al, 2010;Solis-Montero et al, 2005;Priess et al, 2007;Ricketts et al, 2004;Vergara & Badano, 2009;Lin, 2007;Siles et al, 2010;Perfecto & Vandermeer, 2006;Vandermeer et al, 2009;Toledo & Moguel, 2012). According to the challenging economic situation being experienced by the coffee sector (Bray et al, 2002), it would be essential to implement new actions that promote sustainable practices and, in turn, improve farmer's income.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results highlight the importance of coffee to provide the environmental function of carbon sequestration and other services widely discussed in other scientific studies, such as conservation of biodiversity, pollination, regulation of microclimate and extremes events, pest control diseases, and cultural services (Perfecto et al, 2005(Perfecto et al, , 2007Philpott et al, 2008aPhilpott et al, , 2008bMéndez et al, 2010;Solis-Montero et al, 2005;Priess et al, 2007;Ricketts et al, 2004;Vergara & Badano, 2009;Lin, 2007;Siles et al, 2010;Perfecto & Vandermeer, 2006;Vandermeer et al, 2009;Toledo & Moguel, 2012). According to the challenging economic situation being experienced by the coffee sector (Bray et al, 2002), it would be essential to implement new actions that promote sustainable practices and, in turn, improve farmer's income.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1.2 mm d −1 for an annual P of 2000 mm yr −1 (i.e. the approximate average rainfall for the 12 study catchments), vs. 0.9 mm d −1 for shaded coffee (Siles et al, 2010) and 0.2 mm d −1 for sugar cane (Leopoldo et al, 1981). Extrapolating the above-mentioned average values to a year, gives mean estimated ET a totals for shaded coffee, sugar cane, and pasture of, respectively, ca.…”
Section: Field-based Estimates Of Vegetation Water Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We set the surface reservoir maximum storage capacity A X for our coffee AF system equal to 4 × 10 −4 m using data from Siles et al .(2010b). The two parameters of the evapotranspiration routine were taken as: REW c = 0.4 from Granier et al (1999) and r m = 0.8 from field measurements of T ET −1 0 (data not shown).…”
Section: Model Parameterization Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some experimental basins are located in the tropics, like those in Brazil, Costa Rica, Guadeloupe and Panamá (Charlier et al, 2008;Fujieda et al, 1997;Genereux et al, 2005;Kinner and Stallard, 2004), but no coffee AF basins have been equipped so far. Some reports are available for coffee AF systems but at the plot level and for some particular fluxes such as throughfall and stemflow (Siles et al, 2010b), tree and coffee transpiration (Dauzat et al, 2001;van Kanten and Vaast, 2006), surface runoff (Harmand et al, 2007), energy balance and latent heat flux (Gutiérrez et al, 1994). To our knowledge, there is no comprehensive study of the water balance partitioning of coffee AF systems at the basin level, including the behaviour of the aquifer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%