1998
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037<0912:rmarpa>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall Microphysics and Radar Properties: Analysis Methods for Drop Size Spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
174
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a two-moment scheme with a fixed μ, it was found that the microphysical properties of cloud and precipitation are sensitive to the μ values, since the shape parameter plays an important role in determining sedimentation and microphysical growth rates (Milbrandt and Yau 2005). Variations of μ during precipitation events have been reported in previous studies (e.g., Ulbrich 1983; Ulbrich and Atlas 1998;Testud et al 2001;Zhang et al 2001;Islam et al 2012). Considering that the three parameters of the gamma distribution are not independent of each other, an empirical relationship between N0 and μ (Ulbrich 1983) or between μ and Λ (Zhang et al 2001) has been proposed to retrieve a gamma distribution.…”
Section: Shape-slope Relationmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a two-moment scheme with a fixed μ, it was found that the microphysical properties of cloud and precipitation are sensitive to the μ values, since the shape parameter plays an important role in determining sedimentation and microphysical growth rates (Milbrandt and Yau 2005). Variations of μ during precipitation events have been reported in previous studies (e.g., Ulbrich 1983; Ulbrich and Atlas 1998;Testud et al 2001;Zhang et al 2001;Islam et al 2012). Considering that the three parameters of the gamma distribution are not independent of each other, an empirical relationship between N0 and μ (Ulbrich 1983) or between μ and Λ (Zhang et al 2001) has been proposed to retrieve a gamma distribution.…”
Section: Shape-slope Relationmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The three parameters (N0, μ and Λ) in (5) were estimated from the second, fourth, and sixth moments of the observed distributions using the moment method as described by Ulbrich and Atlas (1998) and Zhang et al (2003). In addition, the truncated-moment method (Vivekanandan et al 2004) is also used to test the effects of the fitting method.…”
Section: B Raindrop Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integrated water content of all PSDs was normalized to W=1 g m -3 to emphasize the importance of the shape of the PSD in terms of its mean and dispersion on the reflectivity and extinction. For these PSDs, the equivalent intercept Nw can be calculated from Dm and W (Testud et al, 2001): Figure 4.>> While analytic expressions relating Z, Dm, W, and R can be derived from the gamma distribution (Ulbrich and Atlas, 1998), statistical relationships can also be derived directly from disdrometer measurements without any assumptions of the PSD shape. In Figure 6, scatter plots of kext, W, R, Dm, and Nw versus Z at Ku-band are shown for rain PSDs measured during the IFLoodS field experiment (Ryu et al, 2016).…”
Section: [[H1]] the Particle Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows a rain event in Singapore on the November 12th, 1994. The rain event is classified into three different rain types, convective, stratiform and transition, by using the method proposed in [20]. The classification is done by using both the rain rate, R, and the median volume diameter, D 0 , variations.…”
Section: Data Selection and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%