Remote Sensing of Aerosols, Clouds, and Precipitation 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-810437-8.00013-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Remote Sensing of Precipitation from Airborne and Spaceborne Radar

Abstract: Weather radar measurements from airborne or satellite platforms can be an effective remote sensing tool for examining the three-dimensional structures of clouds and precipitation. This chapter describes some fundamental properties of radar measurements and their dependence on the particle size distribution (PSD) and radar frequency. The inverse problem of solving for the vertical profile of PSD from a profile of measured reflectivity is stated as an optimal estimation problem for single-and multi-frequency mea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement is based on the fact that the average power of the return signal from hydrometeors containing in the radar volume (a fictitious cylindrical volume inside the cloud at a given distance R that is bounded by the main lobe of the antenna pattern and half the spatial extent of the probe pulse) is equal to the sum of elementary return powers from these hydrometeors, e.g., [1]. Several factors can contribute to inaccuracies in the estimation of precipitation and water content of clouds by the radar method (e.g., [2]). In addition to them is a phenomenon of partially coherent backscattering due to the shape of the probing pulse, resonant or Bragg scattering and clustering scattering (e.g., [3][4][5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement is based on the fact that the average power of the return signal from hydrometeors containing in the radar volume (a fictitious cylindrical volume inside the cloud at a given distance R that is bounded by the main lobe of the antenna pattern and half the spatial extent of the probe pulse) is equal to the sum of elementary return powers from these hydrometeors, e.g., [1]. Several factors can contribute to inaccuracies in the estimation of precipitation and water content of clouds by the radar method (e.g., [2]). In addition to them is a phenomenon of partially coherent backscattering due to the shape of the probing pulse, resonant or Bragg scattering and clustering scattering (e.g., [3][4][5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canonical approach in physical precipitation retrieval has been (a) using the single‐scattering properties (SSPs) derived from ensembles of plausible hydrometeors in radiative transfer models (RTMs) for forward calculations to simulate instrument responses, and (b) matching observed instrument responses with simulated ones to arrive at the retrieved particle ensemble properties (Ding et al., 2016; Haddad et al., 2017; Kuo et al., 2016). Consistent physical estimates so retrieved from these microwave observations thus require SSPs of realistic precipitation particles covering the natural ranges of morphologies and compositions (Haddad et al., 1997; Kneifel et al., 2018; Munchak, 2018; Olson et al., 2016). Therefore, the uncertainty resulting from the assumptions of particle geometries or from their SSP calculations constitutes an upstream source of retrieval uncertainties, which is likely to propagate through the retrieval process and cause irreconcilable errors downstream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%