2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0266467410000441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rain-forest canopy-connectivity and habitat selection by a small neotropical primate, Geoffroy's tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi)

Abstract: Wild populations of a small neotropical primate, Geoffroy's tamarin (Saguinus geoffroyi), were studied through 30-s instantaneous observational sampling to identify different canopy habitats used by this tamarin. Tree and shrub canopies were sampled in randomly selected plots and in nearby plots that tamarins were observed to use in the forests of Agua Clara, Panama (28 d, 59 100-m 2 plots, 32.25 h of tamarin observations, 27 tamarins in total), and in the nearby forests of Barro Colorado Island (49 d, 29 100-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we observed frequent obstacles to travel tended to be unpredictable substrates, in which branches snapped as a monkey was poised to leap, woody walkways abruptly collapsed and tumbled downward, winds swirled canopies in chaotic manners, and other unpredictable events that sent primates into abrupt, chaotic postures. We took note of these actions; however, habitat data that provided the greatest reliability and gave the best sense of the structural character of the arboreal habitat was canopy connectivity, based on descriptions by Madden et al (2010), andRaboy et al (2004). By climbing into various tiers of the forest, we found canopy connectivity extending in vertical and horizontal directions, with each calculated category of connectivity (open, semi-open, closed) speeding or slowing down our progress accordingly as we moved through canopies (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we observed frequent obstacles to travel tended to be unpredictable substrates, in which branches snapped as a monkey was poised to leap, woody walkways abruptly collapsed and tumbled downward, winds swirled canopies in chaotic manners, and other unpredictable events that sent primates into abrupt, chaotic postures. We took note of these actions; however, habitat data that provided the greatest reliability and gave the best sense of the structural character of the arboreal habitat was canopy connectivity, based on descriptions by Madden et al (2010), andRaboy et al (2004). By climbing into various tiers of the forest, we found canopy connectivity extending in vertical and horizontal directions, with each calculated category of connectivity (open, semi-open, closed) speeding or slowing down our progress accordingly as we moved through canopies (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such breaks in forest canopies disrupt navigation through arboreal habitats, foraging for food is often optimal in fragmented patches of rainforest where ecological edge habitats typically foster patchy, high concentrations of food for primates (Arroyo-Rodríguez 2007, Emmons & Gentry 1983, Worman & Chapman 2006. Canopy complexity and the scattered resources typical of a neotropical primate's niche favors individuals that employ extreme finesse and wide-ranging appendicular mobility as they forage for food, maintain contact with their social troop, and escape from arboreal and aerial predators (Bezanson 2009, Garber 1992, Madden et al 2010, Smith 2000.…”
Section: Preprintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These students recognized that areas of the forest used by tamarins contained ample data from which to work. By addressing the environment as part of a behavioural study, students made discoveries in the field that gave rise to a canopy-connectivity theory, an explanation about how small primates select routes through rainforests (Madden, Garber, Madden, & Snyder, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%