2006
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-4296.2006.tb00370.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAIM-FDE Revisited: A New Breakthrough In Availability Performance WithnioRAIM(Novel Integrity-Optimized RAIM)

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protection level may be reduced by choosing a different position solution. This approach has been exploited in novel integrity-optimized RAIM within the framework of slope-based RAIM, where single faults are assumed [25] and accuracy constraints are not considered. It has also been exploited in the optimally weighted average solution, which considers both accuracy and integrity constraints [26].…”
Section: E Improvements In the Position Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protection level may be reduced by choosing a different position solution. This approach has been exploited in novel integrity-optimized RAIM within the framework of slope-based RAIM, where single faults are assumed [25] and accuracy constraints are not considered. It has also been exploited in the optimally weighted average solution, which considers both accuracy and integrity constraints [26].…”
Section: E Improvements In the Position Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct Integrity Risk Evaluation (DIRE) Using a Non-Least-Squares (NLS) Estimator. As mentioned in Section 1, three main research efforts have investigated the possibility of using Non-Least-Squares (NLS) estimators in RAIM (Hwang and Brown, 2006;Lee, 2008;Blanch et al, 2012). The first two references pioneered the use of NLS estimators in RAIM, but employed heuristic approaches to reduce integrity risk.…”
Section: Non-least-squares Estimator Design To Minimise Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires an a priori allocation of the total probability of missed detection for the best and second-best ambiguity candidates, which is another problem that must be solved. To avoid this, the constraint for d 0 o and d 0 s is determined by using the concept of worst-case protection, which is commonly used in the integrity monitoring approach (Hwang and Brown 2006).…”
Section: Integrity Monitoring-based Ratio Test (Im-rt)mentioning
confidence: 99%