2011
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.566475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railroad passenger car collision analysis and modifications for improved crashworthiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Crumple zones primarily serve to slow down the collision and to absorb energy, thereby reducing the difference in speeds between the vehicle and its occupants. Complementing advances are reported elsewhere with reference to railcars design [8,29], as well as passenger cars [18,31,40] with the common theme that a safe car does not have to be rigid or has rigid structures. Despite being functional, these design approaches along with their respective and/or related resultant patents [1,4,7,9,19,21,22,23,24,37,42,43,44,46] are primarily destructive in action and simply vary in geometrical aspects, dimensional analysis, configuration, materials selection and identification-cum-location of dispensable members of the particular impact energy management system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Crumple zones primarily serve to slow down the collision and to absorb energy, thereby reducing the difference in speeds between the vehicle and its occupants. Complementing advances are reported elsewhere with reference to railcars design [8,29], as well as passenger cars [18,31,40] with the common theme that a safe car does not have to be rigid or has rigid structures. Despite being functional, these design approaches along with their respective and/or related resultant patents [1,4,7,9,19,21,22,23,24,37,42,43,44,46] are primarily destructive in action and simply vary in geometrical aspects, dimensional analysis, configuration, materials selection and identification-cum-location of dispensable members of the particular impact energy management system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They noted that the optimal distribution of the end structural material can be obtained from the crashworthiness optimum design to ensure the maximum energy absorption of the end structure and minimize the collision deceleration. Baykasoğlu et al (2011) evaluated the structural crashworthiness of a railway vehicle after impact with a rigid barrier at 90 km/h by simulation and proposed a modified scheme to mitigate structural damage that increased the energy absorption capacity of the end structure by 13% and rendered plastic deformation more predictable. Baykasoğlu et al (2012) compared the collision characteristics of the same structures of the middle vehicles, which were composed of aluminum alloy and carbon steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In the field of mechanical structure, the FE models of the corrugated core sandwich panels, the child seat, the four-point contact ball bearing, the aluminum egg-box, and the railroad passenger car were also validated in the similar way mentioned above, and these models were also used to do other further researches, like improving crashworthiness. [12][13][14][15][16] According to the researches in these papers, it will be a more economical and efficient method to assess the structural safety and fatigue reliability using an FE model validated through a simple static test. Hence, a static test of the metro-train bolster was performed to validate its FE model first in this article, and then its structural safety was assessed using the Gerber diagram and a fatigue test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%