2019
DOI: 10.3846/transport.2019.7552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crashworthiness Analysis of the Structure of Metro Vehicles Constructed From Typical Materials and the Lumped Parameter Model of Frontal Impact

Abstract: This paper establishes a Finite Element (FE) model of a rigid barrier impact of a single vehicle constructed from carbon steel, stainless steel, and aluminum alloy, which are three typical materials used in metro vehicle car body structures. The different responses of the three materials during the collision are compared. According to the energy absorption, velocity, deformation and collision force flow characteristics of each vehicle, the relationship between the energy absorption ratio of the vehicle body an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can meet the requirements for engineering design, and has been widely used in research on passive safety in train collisions. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In this study, a one-dimensional train collision multi-body dynamics model was established using "LS-DYNA" software, as shown in Figure 4(a). The vehicle models were simulated using hexahedral solid elements with material #MAT 20, and only the translational degree of freedom in trains moving direction were retained, and other degrees of freedom were constrained.…”
Section: Dynamics Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can meet the requirements for engineering design, and has been widely used in research on passive safety in train collisions. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] In this study, a one-dimensional train collision multi-body dynamics model was established using "LS-DYNA" software, as shown in Figure 4(a). The vehicle models were simulated using hexahedral solid elements with material #MAT 20, and only the translational degree of freedom in trains moving direction were retained, and other degrees of freedom were constrained.…”
Section: Dynamics Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the TS output response matrix and input test matrix of M, V, and D, a second-order polynomial surrogate model for TS concerning M, V, and D is established by the RSM method, as shown in equation (5).…”
Section: Surrogate Model Construction and Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 However, train collisions are diverse and most existing standards are set for frontal collisions without any requirements for side collisions and collision scenarios between trains and other trackside buildings. 2,3 Current research on train collisions is primarily focused on the collision dynamics theory, [4][5][6][7][8] numerical collision simulation techniques, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] collision energy management, [17][18][19][20] and tests. 21,22 In terms of train collision simulation modelling, compared with testing, multi-body dynamics theory and finite element numerical simulation have become commonly adopted methods for designing and verifying the crashworthiness of vehicle structures owing to their advantages of economy, convenience, operability, short cycle time, and repeatability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulation methods include the finite element method and the multi-body dynamics method [4]. Xie et al [12,13] investigated the collision responses of two colliding trains and vehicles impacting obstacles using the finite element method respectively. Compared with the finite element method, the multi-body dynamics method can significantly shorten the calculation time, and the calculation accuracy is within the acceptable range in engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%